U.S. judge strikes down D.C. concealed-carry gun law as likely unconstitutional

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Gryphon

    inveniam viam aut faciam
    Patriot Picket
    Mar 8, 2013
    6,993
    Hogan are you watching?

    I suspect the Governor would love the courts to resolve this so he can escape the scrutiny that is mounting on both he and his hand picked Superintendent for not acting within their lawful authority.
     

    JC92

    Active Member
    Aug 1, 2012
    104
    MD
    After considerable time as a member of MDS, I can now see the logic of building precedent in legal cases and how judicial theory is important. It is always preferable to see your "specific" points championed in a case, but it is more valuable to have your "logic" championed. These cases are building a great foundation which is becoming extremely difficult for biased judges to defeat without resorting to un-sound and weak jurisprudence.
     

    Gryphon

    inveniam viam aut faciam
    Patriot Picket
    Mar 8, 2013
    6,993
    It's a preliminary injunction not a ruling on the merits of the case. Still it's a great preview of what Judge Leon thinks about DC's position - and he is applying strict scutiny. Keep in mind the DC Circuit (DC) and 4th Circuit (MD) are different. A ruling by the 4th in Kolbe on strict scrutiny doesn't create mandatory precedent the DC court need follow and vice versa - just persuasive authority either can consider.
     

    aquaman

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 21, 2008
    7,499
    Belcamp, MD
    The 2nd amendment is the bastard child amendment. They'll just find some anti-gun judge or judges to change the meaning of the words or stay the ruling for a decade.
     

    mxrider

    Former MSI Treasurer
    Aug 20, 2012
    3,045
    Edgewater, MD
    It's a preliminary injunction not a ruling on the merits of the case. Still it's a great preview of what Judge Leon thinks about DC's position - and he is applying strict scutiny.

    So basically, he is saying that he has strong belief that this is unconstitutional, so he is removing the good cause statute until a ruling on the merits occurs?
     

    JC92

    Active Member
    Aug 1, 2012
    104
    MD
    So basically, he is saying that he has strong belief that this is unconstitutional, so he is removing the good cause statute until a ruling on the merits occurs?

    Exactly. Also, his ruling is in direct contrast to the judge handling Gura's Wrenn appeal.

    edited.
     

    cryptoman

    Active Member
    Dec 27, 2011
    174
    It's a preliminary injunction not a ruling on the merits of the case. Still it's a great preview of what Judge Leon thinks about DC's position - and he is applying strict scutiny. Keep in mind the DC Circuit (DC) and 4th Circuit (MD) are different. A ruling by the 4th in Kolbe on strict scrutiny doesn't create mandatory precedent the DC court need follow and vice versa - just persuasive authority either can consider.
    Is it a given that DC will appeal? Given that a preliminary injunction will be in place, and that DC will have to be issuing permits during the time it gets to court again, is it possible that they will not want to spend the time and money?
     

    NatBoh

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 4, 2012
    2,711
    Baltimore
    Ahh, yes! Everyone knows that straight white men dont get a fair shake and that the judicial system is lop sided towards women, minorities, and gays so lets not offend them.:rolleyes:

    Lets celebrate the unbalanced scales of the legal system!

    If it wasnt for the the gays we wouldnt get back our freedoms.:rolleyes:

    Take that men who died for our freedom to keep and bear arms in the first place! They gays have freed us!

    And according to statistics of gay to straight ratios in society, even using numbers on the low end, say 2%, then thousands of gay men have died for our freedoms.

    So yes, I give thanks to all of these gay men, as well as straight men who have fought and died for your, mine, and every American's freedoms and liberties :thumbsup:
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,503
    Westminster USA
    DC will ask for a stay. It's in their DNA.

    As Cypherpunk and others have pointed out, the only part of the law that the Judge enjoined was the "good and sufficient" portion. You still need a permit to carry in DC. This is different than the Palmer /Wrenn case. Don't carry in DC without a valid permit.

    IANAL.
     

    JC92

    Active Member
    Aug 1, 2012
    104
    MD
    Is it a given that DC will appeal? Given that a preliminary injunction will be in place, and that DC will have to be issuing permits during the time it gets to court again, is it possible that they will not want to spend the time and money?

    I wager that it is guaranteed that DC will appeal the PI as there is no downside to the appeal. Losing the appeal reverts to the status quo as it is now. Winning the appeal would allow DC to continue to deny rights while litigation advances at a glacial pace.

    I would expect to see the DC Court of Appeals grant a request for an injunction within 24 hours of DC's request.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,726
    Messages
    7,292,848
    Members
    33,503
    Latest member
    ObsidianCC

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom