I really REALLY hope this can be brought up in court today.
My other wonderment (purely rhetorical, I'm sure) is whether it's enough to reactivate the PII suit?
It should be, and it should be, in my opinion.
I really REALLY hope this can be brought up in court today.
My other wonderment (purely rhetorical, I'm sure) is whether it's enough to reactivate the PII suit?
Folks, be VERY, VERY careful trying to access a government site using "hacking" tactics or methods. I would advise NOT testing the site. You may be violating Federal laws.
Since there is no warning on this site, one may be OK. Just wouldn't "test the waters" on this one.
Nope, time to go back to the judge and have them slapped around with their own pee pee.
Government means the federal government, or one of it's independent agencies.
If the person who entered the information shared it with others and suggested that they try it, it may be a case of that person providing permission to access that specific record.
Yep... this is the PII suit, ripe for a reopen, IMO
Regular use is not hacking.
It is the MSP's responsibility to safeguard any PII, plain and simple!
Wow, that's insane. Now I wish I didn't fill out the HQL app first thing this morning.
Folks, be VERY, VERY careful trying to access a government site using "hacking" tactics or methods. I would advise NOT testing the site. You may be violating Federal laws.
What is PII besides 3.14?
Me: Oh. Okay. Can I pay for that with cash?
MSP: Yes. We definitely like cash.