delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,250
Even if they didn’t bring this exact rule/law back, the problem is that they’ll bring something almost the same. And top that with all the other states, cities and other .govs passing anti 2a laws, and scotus only taking 1 gun case every 5-10 years, the 2nd is gone.
I am hoping for a serious rebuke here. Especially of the court system, for all the lower courts that didn’t see the nyc nys stuff as over the top.
And hopefully Clarence will channel his 2a isn’t 2nd tier into serious guidance.
By contrast look how fast they jumped on the abortion case this term. It’s clear they understand infringement in some cases, but their hate of guns trumps all else.
I am hoping for a serious rebuke here. Especially of the court system, for all the lower courts that didn’t see the nyc nys stuff as over the top.
And hopefully Clarence will channel his 2a isn’t 2nd tier into serious guidance.
By contrast look how fast they jumped on the abortion case this term. It’s clear they understand infringement in some cases, but their hate of guns trumps all else.
The problem with mooting the case is the near-certainty that NYS will change the laws back the instant SCOTUS drops the case. I could see the case being mooted with an injunction against that.
Or SCOTUS could just rule. Were I a liberal, I might be inclined to take that route...mostly because this case is so egregious that any ruling will inevitably be pretty narrow.