SB1 OPEN CARRY AFFECTED???

[Baltimore443]

Question: SB1 is for concealed carry. Will that limit from open carry in banned ccw establishments??

 

[rseymorejr]

From what I understand it will ban open carry altogether

 

[rbird7282]

From what I understand it will ban open carry altogether

Correct, open carry will be banned after Oct. 1

 

[Baltimore443]

Thank you both!!

 

[LAC_MD]

Unless an injunction is granted..

 

[Justoutdoor]

So exactly what is the point of getting a ccw if the only place that you carry is at home

 

[smokey]

So exactly what is the point of getting a ccw if the only place that you carry is at home

You can still carry concealed my dude.

 

[Mark75H]

So exactly what is the point of getting a ccw if the only place that you carry is at home

An injunction was issued on September 29.

 

[teratos]

So exactly what is the point of getting a ccw if the only place that you carry is at home

Where do you think you can’t carry at this point? I can and do carry pretty much everywhere I go.

 

[LAC_MD]

No one has filed a case against the open carry ban that I am aware of. Some states have not allowed it for decades and unfortunately some people who open carry are not trained in weapon retention nor do their holsters have level 2 and above retention built in…

 

[Michael S]

Just to clarify. I do not use on of these but after reading this. Using something like a sneakypete holster would not be legal under this new guideline.

 

[Biggfoot44]

Your Roscoe is fully concealed inside a Sneaky Pete .

 

[Dataluss]

We all know with law, law rulings, the devil's in the details, but FYI, DON'T get jammed up with their "By design" confusion of SB1 law and specifically the injunction:

The District Court judge modified his order from Friday 9/29/23 on the private buildings. Maryland's lawyers asked him to clarify he only meant private buildings and not dwellings and the judge agreed and modified the ruling... so just to be clear, you can legally carry without permission in private buildings but you still need to get express permission to legally carry in a DWELLING ️☹️

Kipke v. Moore, 1:23-cv-01293 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Kipke v. Moore, 1:23-cv-01293 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

 

[LAC_MD]

We all know with law, law rulings, the devil's in the details, but FYI, DON'T get jammed up with their "By design" confusion of SB1 law and specifically the injunction:

The District Court judge modified his order from Friday 9/29/23 on the private buildings. Maryland's lawyers asked him to clarify he only meant private buildings and not dwellings and the judge agreed and modified the ruling... so just to be clear, you can legally carry without permission in private buildings but you still need to get express permission to legally carry in a dwelling ️☹️

Kipke v. Moore, 1:23-cv-01293 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Kipke v. Moore, 1:23-cv-01293 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

WoW

 

[smokey]

Just to clarify. I do not use on of these but after reading this. Using something like a sneakypete holster would not be legal under this new guideline.

Yeah, I don't think fanny-pack holsters or backpack carry either, as they're probably not "an article of clothing"

 

[Blaster229]

Just to clarify. I do not use on of these but after reading this. Using something like a sneakypete holster would not be legal under this new guideline.

WTF is a sneaky pete holster? LOL

 

[Michael S]

Here it is. https://www.sneakypeteholsters.com
I have a friend that uses one, I also bought one but have not used it yet.

 

[Michael S]

As I was thinking about this new ruling, My wife uses a concealed carry purse. That will also be illegal under this new ruling.

 

[FrankZ]

Where do you think you can’t carry at this point? I can and do carry pretty much everywhere I go.

Power plants.

 

[Threeband]

Even in Maryland, I can't see them prosecuting a woman because they claim a pocketbook is not an article of clothing.



What if I carry my phone in a Sneaky Pete, and my gun in a man purse?
It's European.