When did they start caring about that?How about the Number of UNF -- Unfavorable on witness list. 259 entries.
When did they start caring about that?How about the Number of UNF -- Unfavorable on witness list. 259 entries.
It was, and I think still is. But that is still at conflict with all private property (buildings) require explicit permission.Originally it specifically exempted the common use areas. Who knows now though. Until I see final text I'm holding back
Shame is there is some good in this. Forcing MSP to write the training curriculum for one.
You would have to wonder: is Bass Pro at Arundel Mills going to be able to say that they allow the carry of guns if the rest of the mall decides it doesn't?Dick's, Bass Pro, Cabelas, etc. are going to need to post signs that guns are allowed or its is going to be mighty hard to buy a gun there. Not like you could leave with it, because you can't be in possession in these places without explicit permission once the bill is enacted. This isn't just packing heat, but carrying a gun out in a case/box would be prohibited under the law if explicit permission is not granted.
They have their own entrance. It's the only one I use. It would be safer if they walled off the entrance to the mall.You would have to wonder: is Bass Pro at Arundel Mills going to be able to say that they allow the carry of guns if the rest of the mall decides it doesn't?
But does Bass Pro own that location? Or are they leasing it? Does Simon Property Group decide or Bass Pro? How many other locations like this might have that same problem?They have their own entrance. It's the only one I use. It would be safer if they walled off the entrance to the mall.
Delegate Wivell pointed out that the reading of SB1 is that it is the building owner, not the tenant who has to give express permission.They have their own entrance. It's the only one I use. It would be safer if they walled off the entrance to the mall.
I highly doubt it. Now, I suspect the interpretation of a law would be that after giving explicit permission, the owner or their agent could withdraw that permission (and you'd need to leave, not that you'd face immediate arrest).But does Bass Pro own that location? Or are they leasing it? Does Simon Property Group decide or Bass Pro? How many other locations like this might have that same problem?
Can property owners divide the property up into "carry allowed" and "carry not allowed" zones?
It's not a bug. It's a feature.This will screw over tens of thousands of residential and commercial tenants, as well as possibly putting some businesses out of business if they cannot immediately secure permission from the owner.
When I picked up my pistol at BPS in February, the last thing they told me was that I could not take it into the mall even though it had a lock on the trigger and was in the box. Don't know (or care, really) about the legality of this, but it's what they told me.But does Bass Pro own that location? Or are they leasing it? Does Simon Property Group decide or Bass Pro? How many other locations like this might have that same problem?
Can property owners divide the property up into "carry allowed" and "carry not allowed" zones?
Yes, yes I did.Didn't some of those who signed up as in favor really do that to take some of their spots, but were against it?
CMCEBMD
YMMV
I didn't say they started caring! There is always a BUT-- This number CAN and should be used to callWhen did they start caring about that?
“By the way I call it "moral obedience" rather than "civil disobedience" because it is God's law". Those who try to promote un-natural laws on us are committing moral disobedience. It is our duty to resist immoral laws and actions.” By Richard Fry.
Man, you had to say that...Haha. It’s hilarious to see all of these for instances, i’m guessing people believe these lawmakers are really concerned about their citizens, their legally state permitted citizens and will make changes once they get wind of various circumstances.
I personally do not hold the proper legal vernacular for the fact that they don’t GAF, can someone else please remind them?
If we are lucky, they will not find a way to impeach justice Thomas in the next eight years
Until the rules on financial disclosure where changed last month, there was no requirement for these trips to be reported.And just today it comes out that Justice Thomas was taking lavish trips paid for by a billionaire Republican donor and decided not to disclose any of that because at the time, he was supposedly advised that he didn't need to disclose
Just like smoking sectionBut does Bass Pro own that location? Or are they leasing it? Does Simon Property Group decide or Bass Pro? How many other locations like this might have that same problem?
Can property owners divide the property up into "carry allowed" and "carry not allowed" zones?