- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
Only the Anderson hbar in 223 and 300 would be illegal...
Except for Copies of them, which any other AR is a copy, since an Anderson lower is basically the same as any other AR lower, except for what is roll stamped on it.
Only the Anderson hbar in 223 and 300 would be illegal...
Except for Copies of them, which any other AR is a copy, since an Anderson lower is basically the same as any other AR lower, except for what is roll stamped on it.
Could this be a backhanded way to go after .300 BO?
Since with this, any AR in .300 BO would be a copy of the Anderson.
Could this be a backhanded way to go after .300 BO?
Since with this, any AR in .300 BO would be a copy of the Anderson.
Kinda feels like they're probing our reaction to incrementalism.
Is there a way to sue for making it more difficult? I feel that my input is being suppressed. I cannot take off work on short notice, and the hearing scheduling is making this a problem.
Since when does redressing your grievances with your government require you to purchase a specific technology and use that technology as the only method of verifying your request to redress your grievances?
Since when does redressing your grievances with your government require you to purchase a specific technology and use that technology as the only method of verifying your request to redress your grievances?
Like MSP's web site requiring a particular version of Internet Explorer to work properly?