krucam
Ultimate Member
Just started working. They're just looking for some technicalities to get off the hook. Almost zero mention of why this case was brought in the first place.
When's the next deadline(more briefs,exc.)?
I want to say this is now in the hands of the Judge assigned, whether to accept the Motion to Dismiss based on the MTD, the Response to the MTD and today the Reply to the Response.
I feel SAF's Response was well seated and the Defendant's response brought up nothing new from their initial MTD. They brought up arguments against SAF's response, but I think that SAF's initial response brought up great arguments.
The SAF definitely has standing. The equal protection claim (from MD in resp to SAF) is weak. Equal protection is a valid claim on behalf of the Plaintiffs. The Younger Abstention argument has me a little lost unfortunately....