Storm40
Ultimate Member
Just waitng for the MSP to approve the LC9
a fight for another day, but one that needs to be fought.
Just waitng for the MSP to approve the LC9
I will be doing something of similar nature.
Same here.
I've been thinking about this and also couldn't stand seeing this thread slipping quickly down the list on page 2.
Papi4baby said:Is it too early for an update Patrick.
It is the 22nd .
"Historically", briefs in this case pop up on Pacer mid/late afternoon...
"Historically", briefs in this case pop up on Pacer mid/late afternoon...
The Horror, the horror! ....or maybe it will be The Longest Day?
Let's play a little game....
I'll go on record with MD's defense (in amatuerish fashion):
- The 2nd Amendment does NOT specifically cover public carry at any time.
Maybe only when the militia has been called out. We can call this the "Keep your guns at home until we really need them" defense. It does say well regulated militia, so we intend to regulate the hell outta them.
...
-Hocus Pocus, habeus corpus, the Younger abstention, SAF ain't from around these parts, and a rip in the space time continuum. (meaning they will toss out any and all legal-schmeagal stuff they can hoping something sticks).
...
Let's see what they have for us later today.
I really have done a horrible job following this thread.
What stage are we at? Is a "decision" coming today? If so and it's against Maryland, do we "win" or is there ability for the State to appeal? If we won and there is no recourse for the State, what happens to current law right NOW?
Ok so late summer at best. IF we get a "win" will the state have recourse? Would the timeline for "change" be outlined in the decision or open ended with a "for serious" look? Basically, if the Judge rules entirely in our favor August 1st (just for argument), how would that affect ME on August 2nd?
So the State CAN appeal...I thought they couldn't.
how would that affect ME on August 2nd?
a. The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment- filed February 18, 2011;
b. The defendants’ opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary
judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment- to be filed on or
before March 22, 2011;
c. The plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment
and response in opposition to the defendants’ cross-motion for summary
judgment- to be filed on or before April 15, 2011; and
d. The defendants’ reply in support of their cross-motion for summary
judgment- to be filed on or before May 2, 2011.
Inigoes said:While going back through the docket entries...
Is it me, or was Gansler trying to limit the collatoral damage when it comes to civil rights violations, by outlining (admitting) who was resposible for certain areas of the complaint for 2/18?
You think there's a bus in someone's future?