Kharn
Ultimate Member
So how many years does it take to become vested in the retirement programs for the various large departments?
HOUSE BILL 1422
Sponsored By: Delegates McDermott, Cluster, and Smigiel
Entitled: Law Enforcement Officers - Separation from Service - Retirement Credentials
Introduced and read first time: February 29, 2012
Synopsis:
Providing that a qualified retired law enforcement officer retains a specified rank and receives a retired law enforcement photographic identification card from a specified law enforcement agency under specified circumstances; authorizing a qualified retired law enforcement officer to wear, carry, or transport a handgun under specified circumstances; requiring each law enforcement agency in the State to adopt specified written policies relating to photographic identification cards for retired law enforcement officers; etc.
http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/bills/hb/hb1422f.pdf
Maybe this is the first step of eliminating carry permits altogether ala Illinios
HOUSE BILL 1422
Sponsored By: Delegates McDermott, Cluster, and Smigiel
Entitled: Law Enforcement Officers - Separation from Service - Retirement Credentials
Introduced and read first time: February 29, 2012
Synopsis:
Providing that a qualified retired law enforcement officer retains a specified rank and receives a retired law enforcement photographic identification card from a specified law enforcement agency under specified circumstances; authorizing a qualified retired law enforcement officer to wear, carry, or transport a handgun under specified circumstances; requiring each law enforcement agency in the State to adopt specified written policies relating to photographic identification cards for retired law enforcement officers; etc.
http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/bills/hb/hb1422f.pdf
Highly unlikely; Delegate Smigiel is one of the most outspoken pro-2a delegates. I can't imagine he'd attach his name to something anti-2a.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. " Retired cops are civilians, not cops, so the same process or ability must be made available to everyone else if it is allowed to the retirees. The current system passes muster under that standard because everyone is allowed to apply. Now what happens when one group doesn't even need to apply, but everyone else must?Well then what is the purpose of this bill? It seems that once again we are saying person "A" is better than person "B". The fact that person "A" is a retired LEO means he CAN get a permit. The least he should have to do is fill out the paperwork to get it.
" Retired cops are civilians, not cops,
Actually "cops" are also civilians. That is were we are having the disconnect.
Definition of CIVILIAN
1
: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law
2
a : one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force
I always figured that cops were more "sworn civilians," since they're only subject to regular civil authority and not military authority.
Im not a civilian YAY!
2 b: outsider
Furthering the derailment...
When I was in the military I had the pleasure to work alongside numerous DEA and other federal officers in pursuit of synergistic goals in overseas environments.
We called them 'civilians' and they referenced each other as civilians. The distinction occasionally mattered - there were things each side could and could not do - that's why we worked together to fill the gaps in between.
That, and they always bought the drinks. Like it should be.
As a side note, I know many LEO agencies here do not view themselves as civilians. It's in their training, their management and their (recent) culture. It worries me, as does the entire militarization of the US Law Enforcement Community. I have had the displeasure of working and living in places where the police were truly not civilian, and not one time did a good thing come from it.
Judge Legg has ruled in favor or Woollard. The full opinion is available on Pacer.
03/05/2012 53 ORDER denying as moot 12 Motion by plaintiff for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion by plaintiff for Summary Judgment; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; directing clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge Benson Everett Legg on 3/2/2012. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/05/2012)