https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\20-1419.html
Another case is at Scotus. NJ waived their response, but now Scotus wants a response.
I really wanted the court to hear a NJ case worse than anything but we’ll see what happens.
If you read the NJ briefs in the past they’re about as arrogant as you can get. They’ve claimed that since their courts have ruled a certain way in the 1960s that Scotus doesn’t need to weigh in on the issue.
Another case is at Scotus. NJ waived their response, but now Scotus wants a response.
I really wanted the court to hear a NJ case worse than anything but we’ll see what happens.
If you read the NJ briefs in the past they’re about as arrogant as you can get. They’ve claimed that since their courts have ruled a certain way in the 1960s that Scotus doesn’t need to weigh in on the issue.