- Nov 11, 2009
- 31,008
Done.
79309
79309
it's never going to happen- too many gun owners are invested in the inflated prices due to the limited supply. Do an amnesty or three instead. That will get things rolling. NO legislation required.
Done and 52K over the 100K needed!
Problem is, repealing the NFA will not allow more machine guns in the pool.
The Hughes amendment to FOPA 86 is what limits the available machine guns for transfer.
Problem is, repealing the NFA will not allow more machine guns in the pool.
The Hughes amendment to FOPA 86 is what limits the available machine guns for transfer.
The NFA is just one of the dominoes. Once any of the major restrictions (FOPA, GCA, NFA, etc) goes down, the others won't be far behind. They all rely on the same broken understanding of the Second Amendment and as soon as you call that understanding into question and resolve the question appropriately, none of the rest have a leg to stand on any longer.
Really?
You think the Congress works on LOGIC??????
REALLY???
And I'm afraid all the wackadoodles will welcome a petition to repeal NFA as evidence they can use to prove that all gun owners (or at least 176 thousand of us) want no restrictions on our Stinger missiles, grenade launchers, and automatic weapons. You know they will say this.
I agree that it depends on the wording of the new bill. But if it says that NFA is repealed and that's it, the the HA is now restricting something that no longer exists. But if the book says something else and repeals the HA, that would be the smarter move.I would have to look at the language in the two laws.
You are right with FSA 2013, because they changed the text of that section of the MD Law.
However, they COULD repeal FSA2013, by rolling back the language to pre-FSA2013, and the regulated long gun list would reappear.
It all depends on the wording of the new bill.