The House votes on HR 38 today.
Some of you must be reading something different than I am reading.
" Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)) and subject only to the requirements of this section, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, who is carrying a valid identification document containing a photograph of the person, and who is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a state and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm OR is entitled to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State that—"
I do not believe this bill allows us to carry in MD on a non-resident permit.
I also do not want to be the one to test it in the courts.
Some of you must be reading something different than I am reading.
" Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)) and subject only to the requirements of this section, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, who is carrying a valid identification document containing a photograph of the person, and who is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm or is entitled to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State that—"
I do not believe this bill allows us to carry in MD on a non-resident permit.
I also do not want to be the one to test it in the courts.
I believe the confusion is due to the difference between the House and Senate versions. House version = any permit, Senate version = home state permit.
Yes, that's the Senate version.Not home state permit, but a resident of a state is still bound by that states permit requirement. But a MD resident can carry in any other state with a VA permit, for example.
Does anyone really know?Anyone know a time?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
can they detach HR38 and vote on the nics fix alone?
I guess they could, but it's obvious with all the dems whining that it's got a better chance with than without in the senate.
If this passes and is signed into law some state will sue and it will be in front of the SCOTUS before any case working its way up through the normal court process.
I agree. I'll make a bet they'll run to a Hawaii judge just like they kept doing with the immigration laws.
As of today, looks like 4 Senate Democrats (MT, WV, IN, and ND) are on board with NCCR, a 5th (MO) doesn't like NCCR but willing to vote for the bill because FixNICS is attached to it.
So we're looking at a potential 52 (GOP) + 5 (Dems) = 57 Total. Only need 3 more Dem Senators to agree to a vote on cloture if the Dems choose to filibuster (and likely one or more will).
Pressure needs to be put on these Senators.
1) Bill Nelson-D (Florida)
2) Angus King-I (Maine)
3) Bob Casey-D (PA)
4) Martin Heinrich-D (NM)
5) Tom Udall-D (NM)
6) Sherrod Brown-D (OH)
They don't all need to vote for the bill, but if some of them can be convinced to vote to advance the bill that is good enough.
Wildcard: Pressure Sen. Al Franken and Bob Menendez to resign due to scandals, then only need 58 votes for cloture on the bill.
As written, at 0557hrs today , is any Permit.
What dealmaking might or might not occur in the Senate is unknown.
If this passes I just might visit Maryland more often.