I'm new and seeking to learn more about my newly adopted community. The Sipsey blog holds many interesting ideas and espouses ideals I am both familiar with and have embraced - for the most part. But the dichotomy of his support for Bundy, and the statement attributed to John Locke:
"...whenever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people..."
leaves me scratching my head. Bundy declared that people of my background may be better off as slaves, yet the thrust of the Sipsey blog is moral defense of liberty at all costs. For those that support the 3%, I'm curious how you resolve this.
Cheers,
TZ
Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres.
requiescat in pace, Guy