Question on Hbars...for the braintrust

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • lee2

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 8, 2007
    19,012
    ok here goes.
    A colt HBAR marked lower reciever (since the lower is the gun),
    with a non colt upper, still unregulated or not?
    the MSP refers you the assault weapons list....:rolleyes:
     

    Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,889
    I would first ask how the lower was transferred previously.

    Was it done as an HBAR on just a 4473 or was it done as a regulated firearm?
     

    lee2

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 8, 2007
    19,012
    I would first ask how the lower was transferred previously.

    Was it done as an HBAR on just a 4473 or was it done as a regulated firearm?

    good point i will look into this.

    if it was a heavy barrel but non colt i guess it would be ok.
     

    mopar92

    Official MDS Court Jester
    May 5, 2011
    9,513
    Taneytown
    Unregulated if HBAR upper. Regulated if not. Same as the lower sans upper is still regulated no matter what markings.
     

    Name Taken

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    11,891
    Central
    Unregulated if HBAR upper. Regulated if not. Same as the lower sans upper is still regulated no matter what markings.

    I feel a good gun attorney would have an EASY case on a Colt HBAR lower with NO UPPER being sold FTF.

    If the HBAR lower has a non HBAR upper that'll be a gray area for sure...but still debatable.

    HBAR upper and lower you should be GTG.

    The state and fed declares the LOWER is the firearm. If the firearm is labeled Colt HBAR and does not have any UPPER that's a hard case to take to court honestly.
     

    Name Taken

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    11,891
    Central
    In any state but MD I'd agree with you.

    Just read the law.

    The state cant have it both ways.

    It's a easy case really. Colt HBAR is exempt. Show me a Colt HBAR lower with NO upper and it's a FTF gun.

    If the lower isnt marked "COLT HBAR" I wouldnt touch it with a ten foot pole as I dont want to be a trial case.

    It's really no different then the S-12's that some dealers insisted were regulated when they arent. The state makes a defined difference in the law from a rifle to a shotgun. A shotgun on a AK platform is not a AK rifle.

    I always lean on the side of caution with this state...but if your right your right.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,849
    Bel Air
    I would imagine that you would need to go by the specs of how Colt originally sold the gun. The HBAR lower was sold with a particular barrel on it. The law doe not state "HBAR lower". Any other configuration should be sold as regulated to avoid issues
     

    Name Taken

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    11,891
    Central
    I would imagine that you would need to go by the specs of how Colt originally sold the gun. The HBAR lower was sold with a particular barrel on it. The law doe not state "HBAR lower". Any other configuration should be sold as regulated to avoid issues

    But the upper ISNT the firearm...the lower is the firearm. That's why you can get uppers sent directly to your house.

    A bare lower marked Colt H BAR fits the law to a T. Taking the upper off doesnt make the firearm lower a "non Hbar".

    The only debate is putting a non HBAR upper on a COLT HBAR LOWER....does that then make it regulated. That's a chance I wouldnt take.

    I'd take a competent attorney all day to win a MARKED COLT HBAR lower alone is just that....a HBAR and should be FTF.

    Just think of how lose the rulings have been recently. S-12 not regulated. .22 look alikes arent regulated....so there is some vagueness in the laws for sure. MSP, the FFL's, the Attorney General etc. all have evolving looks apparently to the vaguness of the law.
     

    lee2

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 8, 2007
    19,012
    But the upper ISNT the firearm...the lower is the firearm. That's why you can get uppers sent directly to your house.

    A bare lower marked Colt H BAR fits the law to a T. Taking the upper off doesnt make the firearm lower a "non Hbar".

    The only debate is putting a non HBAR upper on a COLT HBAR LOWER....does that then make it regulated. That's a chance I wouldnt take.

    I'd take a competent attorney all day to win a MARKED COLT HBAR lower alone is just that....a HBAR and should be FTF.

    Just think of how lose the rulings have been recently. S-12 not regulated. .22 look alikes arent regulated....so there is some vagueness in the laws for sure. MSP, the FFL's, the Attorney General etc. all have evolving looks apparently to the vaguness of the law.

    well said.
    if you have ever tried to talk to MSP licensing devision, as i have,
    your phone calls go around in circles....:sad20:
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,658
    Messages
    7,290,206
    Members
    33,496
    Latest member
    GD-3

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom