PSLs & Dragunovs

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GunAddict

    GunAddict
    Apr 15, 2009
    477
    St. Mary's
    I know that difference between the two is very similar and comes more down to where they were manufactured as to the main difference. My question is if a PSL is considered a regulated firearm due to it's a similarities to a Dragunov?
     

    midcountyg

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 7, 2009
    2,665
    Preston, MD
    I know that difference between the two is very similar and comes more down to where they were manufactured as to the main difference. My question is if a PSL is considered a regulated firearm due to it's a similarities to a Dragunov?

    MSP does consider them one in the same. I disagree with them, as it is a larger rifle then a mini14, is only available with a 10 round mag, has no bayo lug, no threaded barrel(muzzle break is welded on), no seperate pistol grip, no folding stock.... It only looks like a menacing rifle I guess. Do understand there is a major difference in Dragonuvs and PSLs. The receivers are milled on real Dragunovs and stamped on PSLs. The dragunovs are better built, but no longer imported so very pricey. I have a PSL of my own, and it's a blast to shoot.
     

    GunAddict

    GunAddict
    Apr 15, 2009
    477
    St. Mary's
    The dragunovs are better built, but no longer imported so very pricey. I have a PSL of my own, and it's a blast to shoot.

    I would love to own a real Dragunov vs. a PSL despite the pricyness of it. But I hate owning any regulated rifles as someone somewhere has a record of it:tdown:. Found a good deal on a PSL hence the reason for this thread.
     

    hole punch

    Paper Target Slayer
    Sep 29, 2008
    8,275
    Washington Co.
    ...My question is if a PSL is considered a regulated firearm due to it's a similarities to a Dragunov?

    No, a PSL (also called a Romak-3, Romanian Dragunov, or FPK) is not an SDV. Although it performs the same duty (designated marksmen rifle) extending the range of an infantry squad, it is actually based on an RPK, a form of Kalashnikov. The PSL is regulated in MD because it's an AK which is specifically listed several times on the MSP Assault Weapons list.
     

    hole punch

    Paper Target Slayer
    Sep 29, 2008
    8,275
    Washington Co.
    they're pretty easy to tell apart once you know what to look for. after you've fondled a few PSLs you start to see their AK-iness.

    AIM has em for $700 and i think it's a great deal. I love mine. Check out what Clandestine did to his if you get a chance. (WARNING: strong sexual content! hot russian porn! MIGHT NOT BE SAFE FOR WORK)
    http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=24625&highlight=PSL

    Here's a quick comparison chart. Note the handguards, buttstocks, and receiver covers. Ignore that funky mag on teh SVD, i think that's a .308 or something (unusual looking)
     

    Attachments

    • psl vs svd.jpg
      psl vs svd.jpg
      199.8 KB · Views: 287

    fivepointstar

    Thank you MD-Goodbye
    Apr 28, 2008
    30,714
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Great side by side comparison. so basically the Dragunov is designed after Simonov and the PSL after the Kalashnakov. Are both the SVT and Dragunov C&R while the AK and PSL are not? Also do you know if Kalashnakov based his design after the Simonov or vice versa. Watching a show onthe Military Channel I thought Kalashnakov designed his AK after the Strumgewehr



    thanks for the Russian Weapons 101 Lesson

    edit: never mind....googled Simonov and he preceeded the AK
     

    hole punch

    Paper Target Slayer
    Sep 29, 2008
    8,275
    Washington Co.
    Great side by side comparison. so basically the Dragunov is designed after Simonov and the PSL after the Kalashnakov. Are both the SVT and Dragunov C&R while the AK and PSL are not? Also do you know if Kalashnakov based his design after the Simonov or vice versa. Watching a show onthe Military Channel I thought Kalashnakov designed his AK after the Strumgewehr



    thanks for the Russian Weapons 101 Lesson

    i wasn't aware the SVD was based on any Simonov design. i have never heard that. i can't find anything online except some sites claiming it's an original design.

    SVT's are C&R based on age alone, while (i think) only Russian SVD's (not Tigrs or Chinese NDM's) are C&R. someone correct me if i'm wrong.

    as for the originality of the kalashnikov? i think historians and gun guys will argue that one for eternity. the StG-44 was certainly the first weapon to combine the features we now call assault rifles, they debate how much kalashinov really stole from it. i've heard both sides and i really don't have an opinion.

    i would love to get ahold of a sturmgewehr and tear one apart to see how it ticks!
     

    fivepointstar

    Thank you MD-Goodbye
    Apr 28, 2008
    30,714
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    i wasn't aware the SVD was based on any Simonov design. i have never heard that. i can't find anything online except some sites claiming it's an original design.

    SVT's are C&R based on age alone, while (i think) only Russian SVD's (not Tigrs or Chinese NDM's) are C&R. someone correct me if i'm wrong.

    OK...my bad, looks like he was a student with Tokarev. I'm starting to see the similarities with the SVT-40 and the SKS.


    Sergei Gavrilovich Simonov (1894 - 1986) was a Soviet weapons designer; he is one of the fathers of the modern assault rifle.

    Mostly known for the Samozaryadnyi Karabin sistemi Simonova (Russian: Самозарядный карабин системы Симонова), 1945 (Self-loading Carbine, Simonov's system, 1945), or SKS carbine, he also pioneered the assault and semi-automatic rifle field in the 1920s and 1930s, mostly under the supervision of both Vladimir Fedorov and Fedor Tokarev. His early work preceded both the M1 Garand (of 1933), and the later M1 Carbine, AK-47, and M16 series.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Gavrilovich_Simonov

    here's a good site: http://www.dragunov.net/
     

    hole punch

    Paper Target Slayer
    Sep 29, 2008
    8,275
    Washington Co.
    I would like an SVT-40 myself and pretty much ANTHING to do with the Second World War. :thumbsup:

    Maybe I can make it to one of teh shoots sometime and I'll let you shoot the PSL. She's a hoot, for sure! Sunday's not looking good for me as I might be out of town all morning it looks like.

    Get yourself a PSL, nothing quite like it in the world! It's like somebody took an AK and streeetched it out real long, lol!
     

    armedsks

    Active Member
    Feb 27, 2007
    636
    Sharpsburg, MD
    Svt's are nice weapons. If you find one make sure to inspect the bore and gas system. many of the bores have pitting from years of poor cleaning. Also you abour 8-10 to late, they were under 200$ when they first came in to country.

    Make sure not to break any parts on the rifle. You will have better luck finding elvis or Tupac.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,059
    Messages
    7,306,515
    Members
    33,564
    Latest member
    bara4033

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom