Common sense isn't the law. I've bought/sold guns without a BoS. It also doesn't address the issue with the seller having their gun seized as evidence. They are taking a risk by even starting the transfer process.This doesn't sound right, Common sense would dictate a written bill of sale showing the amount of deposit, the total amount of sale and stipulate completion of sale upon approval.
It's more "they can go to the courts, and the only paper evidence will suggest that they own the gun now". It puts the seller in a position of weakness. Also, see my issue about gun seizure for evidence.In my opinion the sale can be cancelled by the seller with money returned at any point for any good reason, including disapproval. If the transfer does not take place, and the forms are completed at MSP, there should be no reason to take the firearm from the seller. Can anyone site reliable information to the contrary?