question guys:
I remember hearing in this gun bill legislature lots of talk about denying access to un/disqualified persons. Specifically, that an owner can be found criminally responsible/have property siezed if it is determined that they are allowing access by persons that would otherwise not be able to aquire such firearms.
One of my roomates has a felony charge from another state many years ago (long, boring, stupid story). This is actually in the process of getting expunged. I am not comfortable enough to bring firearms into the house (preferring to store them in a safe on family property) just because the laws are not in our favor. I was wondering, if I had regulated/banned firearms after the oct 1st deadline, would it be illegal for me to keep said items in the same house as this person? Would it matter if their record has been expunged? would it matter if they were properly locked?
I remember hearing in this gun bill legislature lots of talk about denying access to un/disqualified persons. Specifically, that an owner can be found criminally responsible/have property siezed if it is determined that they are allowing access by persons that would otherwise not be able to aquire such firearms.
One of my roomates has a felony charge from another state many years ago (long, boring, stupid story). This is actually in the process of getting expunged. I am not comfortable enough to bring firearms into the house (preferring to store them in a safe on family property) just because the laws are not in our favor. I was wondering, if I had regulated/banned firearms after the oct 1st deadline, would it be illegal for me to keep said items in the same house as this person? Would it matter if their record has been expunged? would it matter if they were properly locked?