This thread could be dedicated to pocket carry questions in general, but this post is specific to questions about a device I discovered called a Trigger Stop.
The back story here is that I got the LCP Max back in December with the intent to carry when I couldn't carry IWB. I settled on the CrossBreed Pocket Holster, which I liked, because it has a leather backer which is designed to face outward, making it look like you are just carrying a full sized wallet in your pocket. However, while practicing my draw at home, and at the range, I realized that because the leather pad faces outwards, I have to slip my fingers between the pad and the firearm, and there's no familiar Kydex barrier between my moving finger and the trigger. Maybe, I'm overthinking it it a bit, but it concerns me none the less. In fact pocket carrying has brought quite a few changes to my behavior. I now keep my wallet and keys in my left pocket, in order to get used to not reaching into my right pocket.
Anyway, while looking online for discussions about pocket carry, I recently discovered a little device that is intended to fit behind the trigger while in your pocket/holster. It keeps the trigger from being depressed, even if your finger is on it, but it's also quickly popped out with a slight push.
Here are a few versions I found online:
Amazon - SAF-T-Blok
ClipDraw - Safety Block
Garrison - Micro Trigger Stop
3D Printed Glock Version on Thingiverse
The only one made for the Ruger LCP Max is the Garrison but I'm not about to just spend money on another firearm accessory that may or may not work. I quickly 3D printed the Glock one to test out on my G27. It seems to work as claimed, it fits snug behind the trigger, and is easily popped out before engaging the trigger.
I went ahead and designed on for my LCP Max this morning, and just printed it out for quick testing. I'm not ready to put this in practice yet, but it seems like it would solve some of my concerns about drawing from the pocket holster.
So questions:
Has anyone here used one of these devices before? If so, any feedback.
Is it just a solution looking for a problem?
What sort of downside risks could there be, other than taking about 1/4 second longer to deploy?
The back story here is that I got the LCP Max back in December with the intent to carry when I couldn't carry IWB. I settled on the CrossBreed Pocket Holster, which I liked, because it has a leather backer which is designed to face outward, making it look like you are just carrying a full sized wallet in your pocket. However, while practicing my draw at home, and at the range, I realized that because the leather pad faces outwards, I have to slip my fingers between the pad and the firearm, and there's no familiar Kydex barrier between my moving finger and the trigger. Maybe, I'm overthinking it it a bit, but it concerns me none the less. In fact pocket carrying has brought quite a few changes to my behavior. I now keep my wallet and keys in my left pocket, in order to get used to not reaching into my right pocket.
Anyway, while looking online for discussions about pocket carry, I recently discovered a little device that is intended to fit behind the trigger while in your pocket/holster. It keeps the trigger from being depressed, even if your finger is on it, but it's also quickly popped out with a slight push.
Here are a few versions I found online:
Amazon - SAF-T-Blok
ClipDraw - Safety Block
Garrison - Micro Trigger Stop
3D Printed Glock Version on Thingiverse
The only one made for the Ruger LCP Max is the Garrison but I'm not about to just spend money on another firearm accessory that may or may not work. I quickly 3D printed the Glock one to test out on my G27. It seems to work as claimed, it fits snug behind the trigger, and is easily popped out before engaging the trigger.
I went ahead and designed on for my LCP Max this morning, and just printed it out for quick testing. I'm not ready to put this in practice yet, but it seems like it would solve some of my concerns about drawing from the pocket holster.
So questions:
Has anyone here used one of these devices before? If so, any feedback.
Is it just a solution looking for a problem?
What sort of downside risks could there be, other than taking about 1/4 second longer to deploy?