redeemed.man
Ultimate Member
I believe there used to be. I am certain it was removed from the law.Just bumping this question.... anybody??
I believe there used to be. I am certain it was removed from the law.Just bumping this question.... anybody??
I believe there used to be. I am certain it was removed from the law.
BTW... in case it hasn't been stated in the last 30 seconds, Maryland sucks.
California and New Jersey suck, Maryland's just trying to suck.
In all seriousness, Maryland could've outright banned all "black rifles", "high-capacity" magazines and NFA stuff, regardless of purchase date. So, while our lawmakers tend to be anti-American, Muslim-leaning Bolshevik nit-wits, in all fairness, they could be worse. Thank your lucky stars they're not Californians !!
That being said, I'd rather have a stupid enemy than a clever one.
WrongNo, its in the law. When you get a permit, the State Police judge whether your reason for carrying is valid.
Wrong
See belowHow exactly is that wrong?
Qualification for a permit: (6)(ii) based on investigation, as good and substantial reason to wear, carry, or transport a handgun, such as a finding that the permit is necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.
http://mdsp.maryland.gov/Document Downloads/MDPublicSafetyArticle5-306.pdf
Wear and carry is banned (with some exceptions like transporting to and from the range)
A reasonable precaution against apprehended danger is not an exception to the ban. It is a qualification for a permit. Having a permit is an exception to the ban on wear and carry.
ExactlyAt one time, not long ago, that language existed outside of the permit requirement. It still is not a requirement, it is just an example.
Sent from the 3rd Rock
See below Exactly
You are missing the point. Your reply was wrong because it talked about an individual with a permit. The OP of the question posed in post #6 was asking about someone without a permit.I dont see how that is relevant. At one time not long ago I would not go to jail for dating a 17 year old. Now, I will. Tempted though I might be, its a really bad idea.
You are missing the point. Your reply was wrong because it talked about an individual with a permit. The OP of the question posed in post #6 was asking about someone without a permit.
Isn't there an exemption clause along the lines of if a person carries a deadly weapon as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger subject to the interpretation of a judge? I know I would never want to risk my freedom on that in MD, but has anyone ever successfully used that as a defense in this state?