It looks like the PA Assembly is taking notice.
PAFOA User bill gray said:This was a hearing on an effort to impeach her. The people testifying criticized her one sided actions to ignore law when it suits her rather than upholding laws passed by the legislature. I mentioned the unilateral changes to reciprocity (she is empowered to establish agreements but not to cancel or modify them). Also testified to is her failure to pursue any action at all against politicians who accepted money and jewelry meant to influence their votes. The last testifier was upset over her failure to go after election officials and politicians who committed election fraud.
PA should then/now issue a non-resident permit of there own.
http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/theoffice.aspx?id=71
rain holy hell on this and ask the hard questions
click email contact us
The wording on this document is what is deceiving. They sure are slick foxes up there in PA. Yes you can apply for a Utah CFP if you don't have a carry permit from your state. But the only reason you won't have a resident permit is if YOUR STATE WONT ISSUE YOU A PERMIT. I.E. MAY / WILL NOT ISSUE. PA AG asked the question to get the answer they wanted.
edit: I'm referring to the document ryan_j uploaded on the last page.
The supposed reason originally given by PA AG for dropping FL and VA was the same issue, namely the issuance of NR permits to PA residents to carry because Philly was puling permits for BS reasons.which was fixed when UT agreed to not issue a permit to resident of a state that issued permits. FL and VA had no such requirements so they were dropped. This was supposedly done to prevent PA residents from carrying in PA on an out of state NR permit. So if UT fixed the issue, what's her excuse for this?
Political agenda?