Obama To Unveil Gun Control Reforms In Near Future

[Schwabe]

This country cannot take four more years of Obama!

The best candidate to beat Obama is Romney, we must ALL get behind Romney to win the White House.

Romney is less of a threat to our guns than Obama and his crew.

Do you guys REALLY think this stuff through before you post????

Romney LOST to the guy who LOST to a NO-NAME politician during the last election. Both Bush presidents have been no better than Obama has been. Obama has done so far NOTHING to our gun rights. Hun ownership is more revailant than ever in mordern history, more states than ever have CCW, more guns than ever in civialian hands, gun shows on almost every channel, gun ownership is as mainstream as it has ever been, gun ownership has no longer a mainstream stigma of being extreme, nutty or whatever. We need to continue to strengthen our rights but there is nothing Obama can d to turn the tide at this point only a fogging idiot with a gun causing a disater could.

Romney on the other hand is the architect of Obamacare, he is as much a REP as Christy is, as much as a moderate liberal can be a REP in a democratic dominated state. He is by no means a conservative.

The economy will continue to drag, Romney most certainly will not be able to do anything in the next three years to ge it back on track, not with the type of policies he has supported in the past.

He can't get past 25% support for a reason. A weak REP at this point, IF HE WINS it will guarantee that we have another DEM following and losing dominance in the Congress. He will not have the stomach to make the tough decisions to cut all the entitlement programs and set a time limit on how long soemone could qualify for them.

Romney lost big time support in Iowa compared to last time around. He is an established, rich career-politician, he is the LAST thing we need. He will continue business as usual, like the Bush' did. Tremple on our rights, just like they did, the only difference is the pin on his lapel.

Stop spouting out headline news and some catch phrases you over heard somewhere.

Ths is exactly the same crap we had with Clinton and the piss poor showng of REPs back then, GAS WILL GO UP, AMMO WILL GO, GUNS WILL GET ORE EXPENSIVE, GUN RIGHTS WILL BE TREMPLED ON .... and that was when Brady was still in force and I thught we would never be able t buy regular capacity mags EVER again, I paid $150 for a pre-Brady-ban G22 15 round mag back then. Now our outlook on gun rights is better than in a very long time and no thanks to the Bush; but the grass root work of smaller lcal organzations.

Don't get me wrong I want Obama out as much as the next guy but I want even more for the system to change rather than just the person.
I don't need anoher Bush, Dole, McCain Buchanan, Romney big gov azz who violates my rights even more so than the clearly labeled enemy Obama.

McCains endorsement of Romney after he basically called as all enemies of the state is the nail in the coffin ... if you vote for Romney and he wins you deserve what is coming to you... and we will have this same STUPID discussion in 8-12 years again after having another DEM in the WH. Gained NOTHING just wasted another decade ... and people screaming we have to get Hillary out, no matter what, we cannot take anther 4 years of hers ....

Thank god they stopped teaching history in school too, NOTHNG to learn from the PAST .... NOTHING.

 

[Combloc]

Good post Schwabe!!

 

[Srsanbo]

YES, he is ...

Socialists need more than just their base to support their ultimate goals. The Big banks are 'beholding' now that they're 'owned' by the gov'mnt via the baliouts. Just like the UAW with GM and Chrysler ... guess whose calling the shots ?

When you look past the obvious reasons you'll see the socialist agenda. And come election time, Obama will bad-mouth the big banks with aplomb for being greedy with higher interest and manipulative business practices. And the banks ... they won't say didily because they're nuts will be in the ringer if they do.

If you look back at how the housing thing went down, it was our progressive gov'mnt legislators who manipulated the market. Then they blamed it on the big banks and lending institutions who they were manipulating.

Same thing is happening here ... it's all about control. And all the time the progressive-types will whine about 'unfair business practices aimed at the poor and middle-class' ... sound familiar ? Class warfare at it's finest, but what ever happended to caveat emptor ? The nanny-state has been co-opted by the socialist state.

So car dealers and plumbers, and other businesses who offers 'in-house' financing, better nut up or shut up ... if you get my drift.

The country is getting dumber and lazier each day - Obama is pandering to those that expect the government to make life easier for them. The "change" he promised was elusive when he was smacked in the face with the reality of lobbies and corporate interests. Personally I think his ego is having a tough time with this and he is attempting to act as unilaterally as he can by proxy via all his lapdog appointees.

Through decades of irresponsible fiscal policy, (manipulation still in full effect) the US is on a course toward economic collapse. While Ron Paul is the only candidate that would vigorously attempt to reverse this trend, the country won't elect someone that expects them to suffer a little for the benefit of our nation and posterity. (not to mention his complete 180 from current foreign policy - but how is that working out for us?)

I shudder to think what type of "leadership" we will get from Obama when the world loses confidence in the almighty (not) dollar.

If you think the laws are crazy now, how about a shared currency and open borders with Latin America and Canada - how do you think that will affect our liberty?

In terms of leadership, I don't think Romney is an attractive alternative. Typical narcissist head in the clouds politician - I can picture him saying "let them eat cake".

 

[Tungsten]

Romney is less of a threat to our guns than Obama and his crew.

Romney is an Obama clone, especially when it comes to gun rights.
http://www.nationalgunrights.org/POTUS/Romney.shtml

and i agree 100% with Schwabe.

 

[BenL]

Romney (*spit*) is an enemy of freedom and an enemy of the 2nd Amendment. I will not vote for him for any reason, nor under any circumstances.

...and if the threat is, "we'll get stuck with obuma for 4 more years," see post #28. As bad as that would be, I still think the long game would be in our (gunowners') favor with the current turd over a new turd.

 

[Abacab]

The Mitt Romney signed an assault weapons ban claim is one pf the biggest lies propagated about him. Has he and does he flip flop? Absolutely. But the assault weapons ban is BS. Massachusetts never had a sunset clause in their 98 legislation.

http://www.goal.org/newspages/romney.html

Did he voice support for it in the past? You bet. However, he never signed one into law.

 

[Vince55]

While I agree that Romney is not the greatest choice, I can't see another term with Obama. Given the chance, Obama along with his buddy Hillary will see that the Second Amendment is shredded. If not, he will find ways around it to implement laws that make the Second Amendment useless. I think Romney will leave things as they are and do nothing one way or the other.

 

[jimbobborg]

For those who would rather have Obama in the White House versus Romney, how many Supreme Court justices are old enough to retire now? Do you really want Obama picking yet another justice Sotomayor?