NY ordered to answer to SCOTUS

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Boxcab

    MSI EM
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 22, 2007
    7,922
    AA County
    This is the government not the private sector. Not sure the government runs like that. What I've seen over the years with the 2A cases is that the legislatures and courts don't care what the SCOTUS has decided. They are going to continue to make laws and lower courts agree with the new laws that are the same as what the SCOTUS just said they can't do.
    I see the SCOTUS taking this appeal, fast tracking it, and sending back to the lower court with the language they used, as a shot across the bow. In the past 100 years this has not been done with any 2A case I am aware of.

    Read the ruling above again (using your "mom" or "dad" voice). It is a warning that the games that worked in the past, are no longer acceptable.



    .

    Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
     

    Abuck

    Ultimate Member
    I think Thomas is playing the long game and we may stand to get some more precedent out of this so instead of just NY it helps all of us in socialist replublics like MD and CA and others
    Many lower courts have repeatedly shown to not be entrusted with this right. Although I think (hope) the one step forward, two steps back on the 2A dance has now flipped. The recent TRO in NJ was a refreshing change.

    I sincerely hope that this is it. If Justice Thomas needs to step to the plate again, he’s going to swing the big bat.
    Could you imagine the bed wetting, teeth grinding, and wailing of “F¥CK around and find out, Constitutional Carry Motherf¥ckers!”

    Lol, I don’t expect it to go that far, but one can dream.
     

    KingClown

    SOmething Witty
    Jul 29, 2020
    1,186
    Deep Blue MD
    Many lower courts have repeatedly shown to not be entrusted with this right. Although I think (hope) the one step forward, two steps back on the 2A dance has now flipped. The recent TRO in NJ was a refreshing change.

    I sincerely hope that this is it. If Justice Thomas needs to step to the plate again, he’s going to swing the big bat.
    Could you imagine the bed wetting, teeth grinding, and wailing of “F¥CK around and find out, Constitutional Carry Motherf¥ckers!”

    Lol, I don’t expect it to go that far, but one can dream.
    I really hope he smacks them hard. Its in the COTUS which makes it Fed jurisdition. Id like to see him take in wholly from the states.
     

    rambling_one

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 19, 2007
    6,760
    Bowie, MD
    In this case, I would enjoy seeing that. If they have to step in again, I think a good bit of that courteousness goes away, with a much more direct result. A few of these courts could probably use some tyranny directed at them. Such as the 9th. How can they be so wrong, so often?

    I’d rather not have arrests being made enforcing unconstitutional laws. I know the thought is that having patience is for the greater good. So I will hope for a very short leash with this, and that expedited, means just that.

    I remember Judge Legg’s ruling in Wollard, several years ago. I thought I would have a MD carry permit back then. These things take too long IMHO.
    Amen!
     

    Mister F

    Active Member
    Aug 16, 2022
    112
    Rockville
    I think Thomas is playing the long game and we may stand to get some more precedent out of this so instead of just NY it helps all of us in socialist replublics like MD and CA and others

    Thomas is very serious and sees the racist background of “gun control” law history, and he is not inclined to let it stand. But he is also a professional, extremely senior jurist and knows doing things the right way is important.

    We would prefer things be done right…not “right now”.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Abuck

    Ultimate Member
    We would prefer things be done right…not “right now”.
    At the last days of my 57th year, the petulant child in me says “Booooo!”

    Do what’s right, especially for exercising an enumerated right, when you have that opportunity. I can understand that I am not as smart, educated, or informed as Justice Thomas, and that I have no choice, but to trust the process. Hopefully I’ll still be alive to witness and practice the results.

    As a PA resident, I think it’s extremely unfair that I have spent several decades practicing a right mostly denied to those of you in MD, and other states. And I dislike being stripped of that right by crossing the border in to MD.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,493
    Westminster USA
    I OC in front of two MSP troopers at Mission BBQ in Westminster last night.

    Had a nice convo with them.

    BGOS on display yet again
     
    S

    SW51

    Guest
    Not prohibited, not recommended as may result in revocation of your permit. Good luck
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,630
    Messages
    7,289,127
    Members
    33,489
    Latest member
    Nelsonbencasey

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom