Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,298
Big Stick. Optional pointy on one end .
What is concerning long term is that the term “Unusual and Uncommon” will Always apply to new technology.
I’m sure the Left will say that by striking down this unconstitutional law, everybody will be Kung Fu fighting.
Funky Billy Chin and little Sammy Chung approve of this win
Boy... that post was fast as lightning.
Let's see if NY appeals
Ask them if “Unusual and Uncommon” applies to “smart” guns. The blank stares you get back are priceless.
If the state can try and ban two pieces of wood lashed together by a cord, they can ban anything.
What is concerning long term is that the term “Unusual and Uncommon” will Always apply to new technology.
If this standard is to become the bar for measuring 2A applicability we have a decent leg to stand on right now when fighting to protect Semi-Auto firearms and magazines with a capacity greater than Zero.
However future generations will be fighting criminals and tyrannical governments armed with Lasers, rail guns, armored and mechanically assisted soldiers.
There needs to be a standard set where civilians can never be left behind with respect to future self defense technology.
Sadly this is a fight that the next generations do not even understand.
I always thought nunchucks were legal everywhere.
I mean seriously, how much harm can most untrained people do with them anyway?
I always thought nunchucks were legal everywhere.
I mean seriously, how much harm can most untrained people do with them anyway?
I always thought nunchucks were legal everywhere.
I mean seriously, how much harm can most untrained people do with them anyway?
It was a fad in the 80's...ban popular weapons kids could play with, so they wouldn't hurt themselves. And with all the ninja stuff in the '80's, nunchucks, throwing stars, etc were very popular.
It's for the children!
I always thought nunchucks were legal everywhere.
I mean seriously, how much harm can most untrained people do with them anyway?