Not sure I would've shown this hand just yet. I would wait to see which bills are passed before doing this. Who's to say that someone doesn't catch wind of this and put something in the bill to prevent it? Just my 2 cents.
I just put notice in to take off the 20th. yayyy
Maybe. The sheriff's office has taken over jurisdiction as the chief law enforcement officer for the county. So if he is on board with this then maybe we can get concealed carry at the county level.
Hey...it may be a pipe dream but it's a start.
Living in Montgomery County, the last thing that I want is is to lose State Pre-emption. There are Montgomery County Laws on the book that pre-emption rules as invalid, and I'd like them to stay that way. (page 226 - 228) For example: 1) no online purchases of ammunition, 2) ammo logs, etc. etc. etc.
Thankfully the ATF notes that these Montgomery County Laws are Invalid (State PreEmption):
[Publisher's note: This section was held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals in MontgomeryCounty, Maryland, et al. v. Atlantic Gunds,Inc., et al., 302 Md. 540, 489 A.2d 1114 (1985),and interpreted in Washington Suburban Sanitary
Commission v. Elgin, 53 Md. App. 452, 454A.2d 408 (1983).]
That said, a grass roots effort to put pro-gun laws on the books could help to balance the ongoing misinformation and media biased 'opinion campaign' that the gun grabbers are currently promoting.
Gentlemen and Ladies:
I share concerns about preemption, but there are a couple of points in our favor:
1. It is the people who are the Sovereigns, NOT the state.
2. Preemption presumes federal and state laws are constitutional. Suppose the president and governor instructed local officials to begin confiscation of all weapons immediately? What takes preemption... Federal & State laws or a local official's Oath to the Constitution? Would there be ANY question this is unconstitutional? This requires all local officials to begin reconciling the powers vested in them when they take their oaths. Will they obey unconstitutional laws, or defend the Constitution? Now is the time to decide.
3. Isn't it an irony that a jury of 12 can't take away the freedom of a petty shoplifter without a unanimous vote, but 9 appointed Supreme Court justices can (allegedly) permanently abort your Constitutional freedoms by a mere 5:4 vote? Doesn't a 5:4 vote on a grave constitutional matter imply by default that at least 4 justices are voting "unconstitutionally"? I have heard it said, "If the Supreme Court is the Supreme decider, all we will have is Supreme Tyranny."
4. Soon Obama will change the composition of the court. A new court will likely vote 5:4 to abort 2nd Amendment protections. This is why local officials MUST be prepared to nullify. Sure, there's no precedent and no instruction manual... BUT THERE'S ALSO NO CHOICE. Surrender is not an option. If there is no local nullification, there is no way for elected officials to uphold our oaths... Therefore our right to nullify must implicitly exist.
5. As an absolute minimum, I can pass a resolution prohibiting the use of any county resources or law enforcement resources to enforce a law deemed unconstitutional. For this reason alone, I deem a nullification act more than symbolic.
6. Federalist Paper #78: "No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid."
I will notify all of you when I am ready to proceed forward. If you wish, you may send your names and email addresses to me under the SUBJECT name of MDSHOOTERS and I will email each of you when I am ready.
Send to: rrothschild@ccg.carr.org
Thanks,
Commissioner Richard Rothschild
anyone heard if this is still on...
I sent email to Commis. Rothschild yesterday
but got no reply....