Do want.
Specs?
I didn't know Gemtech made left-handed suppressors!
OAL 21.00" Stock Extended/ 17.75" OAL Stock Collapsed
Nodak Spud XME16 Partial Fence Lower Receiver (Form 1 SBR)
Magpul MBUS Pro Sight Set
Gear Sector Hand Stop
MFT React Short Vertical Grip (Shortened to blend with the Hand Stop)
YHM Spectre 9.675" Lightweight Free Float Rail (Chopped and Faced)
ADCO 4.5 Barrel 13.5x1 Left Hand Threads
CMMG MK9 Ramped 9mm Bolt (Works with Standard AR15 Hammers)
RRA 9mm Upper Receiver
Ranier Arms Raptor Charging Handle
HK 4 Prong 13.5x1 Left Hand Flash Hider (Not Shown)
13.5x1 LH Thread Protector
Attach Clearing Rod (Not Shown)
Magpul MS2 Sling (Not Shown)
Heavy Buffers U9 UCIW 9mm 8.5 oz Buffer
Hahn TOP Loader 9mm Adaptor without BHO
Colt 9mm Bolt Catch
DPMS Lower Parts Kit w/o FCG
Gieselle SSA-E Trigger
Magpul MOE K2 Pistol Grip
SBR and 9mm Engraving
Superior Shooting Solutions Rifle Length Flat Wire CS Buffer Spring
Double Star Dual Sling Plate
UCIW LWRC Stock
Noveske STS 60 Degree Ambi Safety
Throated Barrel
Polished Bolt Tail
Polish Bolt Underside
Tuned Extractor
Cut and Polished 9mm Adaptor Ramps
Bedded Barrel to Receiver
Trued Receiver Face
Polished Hammer Face
Because America, that's why.
With such a short 9mm barrel why not just SBR a glock? It just seems kind of pointless. Why would you want this is kind of build?
As someone who owns a Glock SBR and has some range time behind it, I've got a couple comments. Glock-in-a-stock setups that use a chassis have no appreciable recoil - which makes sense, given that they're not direct blow-back and do have in-line recoil. The real issue I've seen is getting the gun 100% stable in the chassis. The KPOS G2 chassis has a tendency towards vertical stringing unless you customize the fit slightly. Obviously, suppressing it is going to increase kick-back - but this is going to be the same case in an AR, too. You just notice it less because it's so much heavier.Because a SBR glock with a stock has an offline bore axis which causes more recoil and when a Glock is stocked and suppressed the suppressor and booster actually cause the weapon to move off target more and can cause the suppressor to shoot loose. Watch a suppressed SBR glock being shot if you don't believe me. Its violent.
You're kind of describing a worse-case scenario here where you're using a bottom-insert stock rather than a real chassis. I use Troy Micros and a Micro clone on mine, and they're not moving anywhere.A fixed barrel AR is always going to be more accurate and the sights on this wont cycle like on a glock.
With such a short 9mm barrel why not just SBR a glock? It just seems kind of pointless. Why would you want this is kind of build?
The real question is why an NS XM16E1 Lower?
Because it is also a 605 clone when I convert it to 5.56.
FYI, I will also be using a 8.2" .300 BLK Upper, 4.5" .22 Upper, AR57 6" Upper, 20: DMR Upper, and a 13.7" 5.56 Noveske Upper on this lower and my other 2 AR15 SBR Lowers.
Perhaps we should do a pic thread with a poll with my gun vs yours and bobthefishers so we can measure our manhood.
I guess you strip the lower to get back the full stock and traditional grips/selector...etc. I don't know I see that one, but I guess it works. I just hope you have every variation noted in your superfluously paperwork!
Unless the Selector has three positions, the measurement it going to come up short!
That stock works on all of those setups. Not sure what you are talking about with the selector, once I get a DIAS it gets a SSF Trigger Group.
So Bobthefisher has a G18 because that's what the topic is about, having a Glock conversion is somehow more practical than my version.
Good try all 3 of you though. I expect as much from you. Its always humorous when someone tries to school me on a setup when your post shows you don't understand the system you are opining on.
I can also remove the upper, conversion block and be back to 5.56 or .300 in 30 seconds. Cant do that with a Glock SBR. Oh and a pre 86 RDIAS is available for this, not so much for the glock.
I call you out on downplaying Glock SBRs as a viable alternative, you don't really respond and get pissy, and now you're a hero? I knew exactly what I was talking about, thanks. I don't need to be a gunsmith to have a viable and knowledgeable opinion on guns. I will agree that the RDIAS aspect is certainly a point in favor of the AR, but that was never mentioned in the specs.Good try all 3 of you though. I expect as much from you. Its always humorous when someone tries to school me on a setup when your post shows you don't understand the system you are opining on.