Pope414
Active Member
I sincerely hope if the NYC case is rendered Moot the justices take Rogers. to get rejected would be like salt in the wound.
Well tomorrow is April 19TH lets see will we get:
A) A response that is nothing but a cut and paste of Drake
B) A response that is original yet entertaining
c) A request for a 2nd extension
Yeah, looks like they went with "Wrenn was wrong."
While the above discussion offers sufficient basis to deny this petition for certiorari altogether, this Court could also hold the petition pending this Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York, No. 18-280. Subsequent to the filing of this Petition, this Court granted the writ in NYSRPA, which asks “[w]hether [New York] City’s ban on trans-porting a licensed, locked, and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the constitutional right to travel.” Since disposition of this petition may be affected by the ultimate resolution of NYSRPA, the petition could be held pend-ing that decision. Doing so is an established part of this Court’s practice, advances judicial economy, and signals nothing about the significance of the underlying constitutional provision, stat-ute, or rule.
Fantastic news!
They also went with "please take Gould instead"
lol.
and oh yeah, by the way footnote 8:
My view is that the fact that they went with a vigorous defense "Wrenn was wrong but please take Gould" raises the odds of this being granted cert and consolidated with NYSRPA. SCOTUS likes vigorous opposition esp when they are arguing "History and tradition show that state public carry laws like this one are consistent with the Second Amendment right ". I think at bare minimum this will be held pending NYSRPA.
It's even worse. Weak and pathetic -- claiming the circuit split is over-stated; Wrenn does not apply to NJ because our ban has been in place longer; Drake already decided everything, etc.
A day of reckoning is coming. Could be now. Could take one more justice. We'll see ...
I also wonder what Herr Frosh and his minions at the MSP Lic Div are thinking after they have read what NJ submitted as well. I hope it is giving Herr Frosh some grief and a major headache after he has read what a lousy job NJ did..plus what do our legal eagles think of the reply by NJ?
Drake was denied Cert so this should be too...
Wrenn was wrong...
CA7 was different, total ban...
Finally, sounded like they’re daring Petitioners to do a FOIA request and get the number of issuances vs applications. That MAY be an issue if nobody bothers trying...
Drake was denied Cert so this should be too...
Wrenn was wrong...
CA7 was different, total ban...
Finally, sounded like they’re daring Petitioners to do a FOIA request and get the number of issuances vs applications. That MAY be an issue if nobody bothers trying...