danb
dont be a dumbass
here you go men
here you go men
4 people wont grant cert for a case unless they are reasonably sure where the 5th vote is.
I am just worried about Roberts. For all we now he is going to say the justifiable need standard is a "tax"
So when do we expect the jersey case to be reviewed/ decided?
Depends on if NJ asks for extensions. At best, maybe 2-3 months to get to conference.
Amici from Arizona and 22 states posted: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Docket...rief - Rogers v. Grewal_FINAL - 23 States.pdf
It's all stats on shall-issue vs. may-issue crime rates.
I just had a horrible thought....SCOTUS took the 2A case out of NY dealing with transporting you firearm outside the state after not taking a case since Heller.... Could it be they took that case so they can say they finally took a 2A case giving them an out to not wade into the right to carry without having to prove justifiable need? Especially After justices Thomas and Gorsuch ripped the court a new one short of calling them cowards??? It seems like the NY case would effect such a small group compared to a challenge to justifiable need. Compared to Drake,Perulta and now Rogers it seems like small potatoes .....boy do I hope I am wrong
This is my fear as well.
This case isn't about carry. It's about the core right of firearms ownership and transportation between homes intrastate, to places of lawful use intrastate (ranges), and interstate transport. And it's also about whether a state can arbitrarily outlaw any aspect of firearms ownership it wants to, even when that law isn't rational.
This case isn't about carry. It's about the core right of firearms ownership and transportation between homes intrastate, to places of lawful use intrastate (ranges), and interstate transport. And it's also about whether a state can arbitrarily outlaw any aspect of firearms ownership it wants to, even when that law isn't rational.