The original wording required it. The wording in the version on Jan 3rd did not
Weren't you arguing that you needed a home state ccw? If it wasn't you, I meant to post in response to who was arguing that. Sorry
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder if we can get a bill that will address certain ban aspects such as magazine capacity or hollow points in NJ. None of the bills I have seen so far address these issues.
They allow expanding ammunition. Critical duty/defense is permitted. The hollow point has been filled with polymer and somehow it is no longer a hollow point...NJ's idiocy (requiring non-expanding/ball ammunition generally requiring more shots (trauma) to stop a threat... and having a higher likelihood of both over-penetration and fragmenting, thus increasing injury to (innocent) bystanders - can easily be overcome:
https://www.federalpremium.com/ammunition/handgun/family/guard-dog/guard-dog/pd9grd#2
They allow expanding ammunition. Critical duty/defense is permitted. The hollow point has been filled with polymer and somehow it is no longer a hollow point...
I think they know it when they see it, LOLNot to threadjack, but what does NJ ban again, exactly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
But seriously, here it is:
Oh, no. I was arguing that the idiotic constitutional carry reciprocity provisions will greatly harm our chances of getting this bill passed.
What's idiotic about it? 25% of states have already implemented it in some form...that percentage grows every year. Politically, I think you start with it then push for all it's worth. We are close to sixty Senate votes on this.
If it fails or doesn't get support, then you just exempt "may issue" states from national reciprocity and celebrate a minor victory that does jack crap for millions of Americans who live in states who disregard constitutional protections on the right to keep and bear arms.