Sharpeneddark
Ultimate Member
It's job security. If they have this huge backlog, then they can justify maintaining their larger staff going into the new fiscal year and they'll have plenty to do.
Plus, if you read the financial plan that goes with SB281, they are already spending the millions they'll bring in from our pockets now that we have to pay to register every firearm. They are planning for the purchase rate to remain high. They didn't take into consideration that if they only require fingerprinting for new purchases that sales will tank. That's why I think they'll want to fingerprint everyone registering anything, not just new purchases.
I wonder if we have to surrender what we currently own while we wait three months for them to process the registration so we can have our stuff back. They are holding transfers now...
By 'new purchasers', do you mean first time purchasers?
The way I read SB281 is that the fingerprinting will be required for everyone registering after Oct 1st. Regardless if you have a regulated firearm on record already. But if you are already in the queue, then the fingerprinting is not required. Meaning if you fill out and submit paperwork in September, you're fine even if the backlog prevents you from getting your firearm until 2014. If they are assuming that the purchase rate will remain high, then there is no real incentive of purposely holding back on not disapproving. There's no incentive of working as fast as possible, either, but there's no incentive for purposely holding back.
The benefit of having a regulated firearm prior to Oct 1st, according to SB281, is that the training (and perhaps even the proficiency) requirement is waived. It is also waived if you are an active or retired LEO or active or honorably discharged service member.
As for your last comment, there is simply no evidence of this. The law states that those who currently own regulated firearms are grandfathered in, no licensing required. So if you submit your paperwork for your last regulated firearm on September 30th, 2013 and never ever want to purchase another regulated firearm, you will never have to get licensed. As the bill/law stands now. They are not coming to take your guns, yet. Is that their agenda? Yes. But they can't make that move, yet. They are probably waiting on the next tragedy to do that. Or waiting for the Feds to do it.