Darkemp
Ultimate Member
Looks like they got a criminal supplier of other criminals, good job to MSP I’d say. They didn’t hit him with the SBR charge yet though it seems.
"What is an unregistered AR-15 and 9mm handgun, Ammunition, components"
Am I supposed to being registering my Ammo and components?
I believe the guy is prohibited. Also caught with jars of tannerite, another Md no-no.
I could be wrong. But I almost got the vibe that they knew who they were going to pull over, in advance.
I think they more than suspected something, had him under surveillance, and used the window tint as an excuse to pull him over.
That AR is clearly an SBR. Would be even with a brace, with the vertical fore grip.
I think that's the " unregistered firearm" charge.
Looks to me like what some are calling a faux supressor is a KAK flash can.
The barrel on that rifle looks kind of short to me.
I'm betting the AR sealed his fate.
Without more detail about the interaction with the suspect, I’m curious as to how a window tint violation sparked them to seek and obtain thru a judge a “probable cause” search warrant for the vehicle. Don’t the police have to say why they want a warrant when they approach a judge for such things? I guess we don’t have all of the facts, it seems to me the police caught a lucky break with this one, or like several have said, they may have already had him in their sights.Stopped for illegal window tinting
Didn’t we have a thread recently where several members expresses rather cavalier opinions about tinting.
Without more detail about the interaction with the suspect, I’m curious as to how a window tint violation sparked them to seek and obtain thru a judge a “probable cause” search warrant for the vehicle. Don’t the police have to say why they want a warrant when they approach a judge for such things? I guess we don’t have all of the facts, it seems to me the police caught a lucky break with this one, or like several have said, they may have already had him in their sights.
If you're a convicted felon, don't LEO's have the authority (without your consent) to search your vehicle if stopped? Or, is that for peeps that are on probation/parole? I remember seeing something mentioned about this on Cops or Live PD, back in the good ol' days when we actually had cop shows on TV.
If you're a convicted felon, don't LEO's have the authority (without your consent) to search your vehicle if stopped? Or, is that for peeps that are on probation/parole? I remember seeing something mentioned about this on Cops or Live PD, back in the good ol' days when we actually had cop shows on TV.
Terry vs Ohio basically said if an officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has a weapon which puts the officer at risk, he can search the individual. IANAL and time has dimmed my memory so don't start throwing darts.