pcfixer
Ultimate Member
LOL. Does This Apply?
Sadly this appears to be true. Years ago I read a line from someone that sums up the peoples' view on society perfectly: people don't want liberty, they want their way. Fixing this is the crux of the matter. All other issues spring from this.I think most people that are anti-2nd also are anti-1st. Maybe even unwittingly but nevertheless, anti-1st by both action and words. Especially since, for practical purposes, the 1st has been suspended.
Sadly this appears to be true. Years ago I read a line from someone that sums up the peoples' view on society perfectly: people don't want liberty, they want their way. Fixing this is the crux of the matter. All other issues spring from this.
He wants to "get it right" you know.....Agreed.
I just hope he uses that disgust to "do the right thing."
That's the former lawyer in him saying that with despair, not the Judge he swore to be.I was there for the hearing, the tone of his voice when he said that was even better than the words alone. You could hear the despair on knowing he was in between a rock and a hard place.
Yup. It's embarrassing. He's a disgrace to the judiciary IMHO, and if by some reason he decides to rule in favor of MoCo in the face of Bruen, I hope the smackdown he gets on appeal leaves a lasting mark that dead-ends his career. This is a Judge who should not be on the bench.The poor fella. Finds himself struggling over what “is” is.
Sorry, what's this an abbreviation for?EBMD
Everywhere But Metal DetectorsSorry, what's this an abbreviation for?
Just carry one of those undetectable ghost guns of killy death.Everywhere But Metal Detectors
As far as this case goes, this means nothing to this Judge.Delayed = Denied
Thank you.Everywhere But Metal Detectors
Well said.Sadly this appears to be true. Years ago I read a line from someone that sums up the peoples' view on society perfectly: people don't want liberty, they want their way. Fixing this is the crux of the matter. All other issues spring from this.
Apparently this effective abrogation of an enumerated constitutional right wasn't urgent enough for the Judge, which begs the question, "What would be?".Denial of a constitutional right constitutes irreparable harm under the PI framework. That is supposed to be all the urgency a judge needs.
Beyond the legal framework, as I see it the practical urgency is tied to the rash of crimes being committed (car jackings, murders, etc.) in these 100 yard no-self-defense zones in MoCo. It is not hypothetical that people who are legally required to be unarmed are being victimized in the areas covered by this unconstitutional law.
Sadly this appears to be true. Years ago I read a line from someone that sums up the peoples' view on society perfectly: people don't want liberty, they want their way. Fixing this is the crux of the matter. All other issues spring from this.
No I was talking about the lawyer from montgomery county when he said he wanted to keep his jobThat's the former lawyer in him saying that with despair, not the Judge he swore to be.
It's absolutely disgraceful how he's handled this case.