Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,311
What happens if you have a ccw and carry in these "safe spaces"?
$1,000 and 6 months ( potential)
What happens if you have a ccw and carry in these "safe spaces"?
It's not posted here yet: https://apps.montgomerycountymd.gov/ccllims/BillDetailsPage?RecordId=2761&fullTextSearch=21-22Does anyone have a link to the text of the final bill?
Well they reversed Roe vs Wade did they not?Unfortunately, unless SCOTUS reverses itself, legislators have immunity for legislative acts. Tenney v. Brandhove (1951):
Yup. We definitely will, but it can't only be a lawsuit against the County Council. There also needs to be lawsuit filed under Section 1983 against the County Council Members to make them personally liable for this deliberately unconstitutional legislative action. They need to feel this in their own pocketbooks, not ours. That's how we put a stop to this kind of thing from happening in the future.
It would be amusing if this sort of action by local and state governments was a deciding factor for SCOTUS to remove immunity from officialdom.Well they reversed Roe vs Wade did they not?
The Montgomery County Council deliberately and intentionally enacted this law, with the complete knowledge that doing so infringed upon the 2nd Amendment Rights of people who legally carry in the County, especially in light of Bruen.It would be amusing if this sort of action by local and state governments was a deciding factor for SCOTUS to remove immunity from officialdom.
Isn't qualified immunity invalid if malicious intent can be proven? Wouldn't this be demonstrated by the MoCo council after being informed of the ramifications of the Bruen decision was made known to them? Their subsequent action flies in the face of the decision, point by point.
How long will the Court continue to tolerate deliberate refusal to adhere to their decisions?
The Montgomery County Council deliberately and intentionally enacted this law, with the complete knowledge that doing so infringed upon the 2nd Amendment Rights of people who legally carry in the County, especially in light of Bruen.
Raskin gave it all away when he said what he said:
I'd love to see this be a watershed moment for malicious intent.
And Plessy v Ferguson. The court can right wrongs, so it stands to reason they can wrong Rights…ever vigilant.Well they reversed Roe vs Wade did they not?
yep. And Raskin better look in the mirror---"under draconian and foolish new Supreme Court decisions."More Liberty is the new draconian.
Thanks for doing that. I think MSI is doing great work and a little bit from everyone will go a long way.Just donated to MSI... go get them! (Please!)
Could you argue that they are in insurrection against the government by openly flouting a supreme court ruling?It would be amusing if this sort of action by local and state governments was a deciding factor for SCOTUS to remove immunity from officialdom.
Isn't qualified immunity invalid if malicious intent can be proven? Wouldn't this be demonstrated by the MoCo council after being informed of the ramifications of the Bruen decision was made known to them? Their subsequent action flies in the face of the decision, point by point.
How long will the Court continue to tolerate deliberate refusal to adhere to their decisions?