jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
They stayed the district court opinion based on Duncan. It is an issue that was raised when CA appealed the district court opinion.Anyone listen?
i tried. Between hospital with sick friend and spotty signal, didn’t hear much.
the little bit I did hear …
They didn’t want to do anything until Duncan resolved
one of the lady judges maybe both seemed to go along with the states not protected argument
seems the jump from panel to en banc in Duncan is leading the resistance, it the result is anti 2a as speculated in Duncan
It is official. They have held the case in abeyance pending the resolution of Duncan.They stayed the district court opinion based on Duncan. It is an issue that was raised when CA appealed the district court opinion.
I'm afraid I'd have a hard time biting my tongue. "Well, your honor, a lot of people also like to look at and collect finely made fountain pens that they can use to write down controversial thoughts that are protected by the amendment that sits right next the one we're discussing."Listening to parts of this again. The judge on the left has an attitude that clearly displays her contempt for the 2a. She’s in the FY column on any 2a case
J=judge on left
L=2a lawyer
J: so 2a protects common arms used for defense
L: no, it protects common arms used for all lawful purposes, including defense
J: oh. THEY like to look at them right (referring to the guns)
with such open contempt, is there a way to get the judge tossed? Recused?
I guess it would not be polite to note such contempt in the middle of the hearing … would it?
(half / half… sarcasm on one half, maybe well over half, but honest evaluation of the judges attitude)