Maryland Shall Issue Files Suit Against the Maryland State Police

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • zenMonkey

    Active Member
    Patriot Picket
    Mar 30, 2013
    302
    This is really fantastic news. Thank you MSI, I will be joining up as soon as I finish this post.
     

    CrimsonJer

    Member
    Apr 4, 2013
    46
    Ferndale
    Maryland Shall Issue, in association with the Associated Gun Clubs of Maryland, the Maryland Licensed Firearm Dealers Association, and several individual plaintiffs filed a complaint today in Baltimore County Circuit Court against the Maryland State Police (MSP) for the state’s failure to process firearm applications within the seven days mandated by Maryland law.

    The MSP’s failure to comply with its statutory duty -- which MSP has admitted is taking closer to 55 than the required seven days -- infringes the fundamental constitutional right of Maryland citizens to purchase and keep firearms for purposes of self-defense in their homes, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and puts them at risk while the bureaucracy takes its time to process citizen applications. The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling the MSP to process all firearms applications in seven days as required by law.

    Additionally, the MSP’s failure to issue approvals has caused significant economic harm to licensed firearms dealers in Maryland. These business owners also risk civil or criminal sanctions if a firearm has been transferred to a purchaser whose application is later disapproved by the MSP.

    We have requested an expedited review of this case given the nature of the harm brought against our members who are attempting to exercise a civil right. Additionally, the plaintiffs are listed as anonymous individuals - publishing their names would provide those persons looking to do harm notice that their potential victim is unarmed. For this reason, we ask that you do not speculate on their identity.

    Complaint and filings attached. Understand MSI is limited in the questions we can respond to at the moment.

    MSI is working multiple avenues to protect your rights. As disappointing as it is to have to go to court to protect a civil right, we are not shy about doing so.

    Well, you pretty much just got me to finally join up with MSI. I'm a proud new member.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,507
    This and Cecil County's action are very spirit lifting!

    Indeed they are... :thumbsup:

    Is the NRA in anyway assisting in this and can the NAACP and or ACLU be brought in on this too? This also effects the ability of any minority buyers and dealers in the State to exercise there rights under 2A. Any additional "clout" that can be tapped into should assist in the fight.
     

    HiballHiside

    Active Member
    Apr 10, 2013
    544
    Maryland Shall Issue, in association with the Associated Gun Clubs of Maryland, the Maryland Licensed Firearm Dealers Association, and several individual plaintiffs filed a complaint today in Baltimore County Circuit Court against the Maryland State Police (MSP) for the state’s failure to process firearm applications within the seven days mandated by Maryland law.

    The MSP’s failure to comply with its statutory duty -- which MSP has admitted is taking closer to 55 than the required seven days -- infringes the fundamental constitutional right of Maryland citizens to purchase and keep firearms for purposes of self-defense in their homes, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and puts them at risk while the bureaucracy takes its time to process citizen applications. The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling the MSP to process all firearms applications in seven days as required by law.

    Additionally, the MSP’s failure to issue approvals has caused significant economic harm to licensed firearms dealers in Maryland. These business owners also risk civil or criminal sanctions if a firearm has been transferred to a purchaser whose application is later disapproved by the MSP.

    We have requested an expedited review of this case given the nature of the harm brought against our members who are attempting to exercise a civil right. Additionally, the plaintiffs are listed as anonymous individuals - publishing their names would provide those persons looking to do harm notice that their potential victim is unarmed. For this reason, we ask that you do not speculate on their identity.

    Complaint and filings attached. Understand MSI is limited in the questions we can respond to at the moment.

    MSI is working multiple avenues to protect your rights. As disappointing as it is to have to go to court to protect a civil right, we are not shy about doing so.

    Can you answer these questions:

    1. Is the AG or Court of Baltimore required to act quickly or can this be "lost" in the inbox until such a time they want to take it up?
    2. Will the AG have a say in this case, because apparently he things SB281 is actually constitutional.
     

    gmhowell

    Not Banned Yet
    Nov 28, 2011
    3,406
    Monkey County
    Can you answer these questions:

    1. Is the AG or Court of Baltimore required to act quickly or can this be "lost" in the inbox until such a time they want to take it up?
    2. Will the AG have a say in this case, because apparently he things SB281 is actually constitutional.

    1. The filings request a speedy decision. The court can say 'fu' to this.

    2. I believe the MSP has their own council. Even if this is the case, expect the AG to consult heavily on it.
     

    Mr H

    Banana'd
    I'm not sure this is NRA territory, honestly...

    It's not training, and it's not safety... It's not legislative, so no NRA-ILA.

    It's not a direct and harmful infringement (though I suppose that could be open to interpretation), so no SAF.

    The only "national" group I see that might have an interest here MIGHT be GOA... but that's pure wildthnk on my part.

    What IS important, though (IMO), is that MLFDA is a party... If the DEALERS are bothered too, then that means something.

    Also, on a very cursory read, the parties MAY include (however tangentially) any AGC and/or MSI member with an outstanding purchase at the time of filing. Happy to be corrected on that, though.
     

    6Den

    Active Member
    Feb 10, 2013
    835
    Howard County
    Also, on a very cursory read, the parties MAY include (however tangentially) any AGC and/or MSI member with an outstanding purchase at the time of filing. Happy to be corrected on that, though.

    I sure hope so -- I'm a member of both AND I bought a pistol today:D

    Excellent work, Patrick and MSI!!
     

    iH8DemLibz

    When All Else Fails.
    Apr 1, 2013
    25,396
    Libtardistan
    Thank you, MSI.

    And Patrick-U DA MAN!!!

    I can hear their Collective Puckerholes tightening up all the way in Pikesville.

    My Snake thanks you too.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,725
    Messages
    7,292,794
    Members
    33,503
    Latest member
    ObsidianCC

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom