BRUTE wrote:
Factcheckers have evaluated these claims and have determined that they are false/misinterpreted/misrepresented/misinformation/digitally altered (select one or more).
But therein lays our ongoing problem: "who are the 'Factcheckers" Who decided that the "factcheckers" are/were "pure" in their evaluation?
Not sure we will ever know. Goes back to " Don't believe anything you read, and only half of what you think you see"......and that goes double for anything "Political" So it goes.
Factcheckers have evaluated these claims and have determined that they are false/misinterpreted/misrepresented/misinformation/digitally altered (select one or more).
But therein lays our ongoing problem: "who are the 'Factcheckers" Who decided that the "factcheckers" are/were "pure" in their evaluation?
Not sure we will ever know. Goes back to " Don't believe anything you read, and only half of what you think you see"......and that goes double for anything "Political" So it goes.