I swear 3paul. It's the last time!
Step one is admitting you have a problem.
I swear 3paul. It's the last time!
Liberals/leftists can face down a gunman with harsh words. This is what they get for supporting policies restricting access. I wonder how they like waiting for a HQL?
Regardless, having a weapon is not as crucial as having motivation and skills.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also, not every one is liberal on ALL issues or conservative on ALL issues.
Without the 2A the rest of the A's are suggestions.
Love the TP rolls falling out of her bag...
But...but...
How Im sposed to protect my thousand rolls of TP?
You let the police protect you like a good little citizen.
My sister-in-law is a big time lib and when I told her they don't have to protect you, she went off. I explained it is case law (my term, not sure the correct term) that they don't have the constitutional duty to protect you. Even with the link to the 2005 ruling, she didn't accept.
Oh well, so much for invites to family gatherings.
The DeShaney decision has been cited by many courts across the nation and reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Namely—on June 27, 2005, in Castle Rock v. Gonzales, the U.S. Supreme Court again ruled that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm.[8] The decision overturned a federal appeals court ruling which permitted a lawsuit against the town of Castle Rock for the police’s failure to respond after Jessica Gonzales tried to get the police to arrest her estranged husband Simon Gonzales for kidnapping their three daughters (ages 7, 8, and 10) while they were playing outside, in violation of a court-issued protective order. [9] After Simon called to tell Jessica where they were at (in Denver at an amusement park), for hours she pleaded for the police to arrest Simon. [10] But, the police failed to act before Simon showed up at the police department and started shooting inside, and with the bodies of the 3 children in the trunk of his car.[11]
https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect
My sister-in-law is a big time lib and when I told her they don't have to protect you, she went off. I explained it is case law (my term, not sure the correct term) that they don't have the constitutional duty to protect you. Even with the link to the 2005 ruling, she didn't accept.
Oh well, so much for invites to family gatherings.
The DeShaney decision has been cited by many courts across the nation and reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Namely—on June 27, 2005, in Castle Rock v. Gonzales, the U.S. Supreme Court again ruled that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm.[8] The decision overturned a federal appeals court ruling which permitted a lawsuit against the town of Castle Rock for the police’s failure to respond after Jessica Gonzales tried to get the police to arrest her estranged husband Simon Gonzales for kidnapping their three daughters (ages 7, 8, and 10) while they were playing outside, in violation of a court-issued protective order. [9] After Simon called to tell Jessica where they were at (in Denver at an amusement park), for hours she pleaded for the police to arrest Simon. [10] But, the police failed to act before Simon showed up at the police department and started shooting inside, and with the bodies of the 3 children in the trunk of his car.[11]
https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect
My sister-in-law is a big time lib and when I told her they don't have to protect you, she went off. I explained it is case law (my term, not sure the correct term) that they don't have the constitutional duty to protect you. Even with the link to the 2005 ruling, she didn't accept.
Oh well, so much for invites to family gatherings.
The DeShaney decision has been cited by many courts across the nation and reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Namely—on June 27, 2005, in Castle Rock v. Gonzales, the U.S. Supreme Court again ruled that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm.[8] The decision overturned a federal appeals court ruling which permitted a lawsuit against the town of Castle Rock for the police’s failure to respond after Jessica Gonzales tried to get the police to arrest her estranged husband Simon Gonzales for kidnapping their three daughters (ages 7, 8, and 10) while they were playing outside, in violation of a court-issued protective order. [9] After Simon called to tell Jessica where they were at (in Denver at an amusement park), for hours she pleaded for the police to arrest Simon. [10] But, the police failed to act before Simon showed up at the police department and started shooting inside, and with the bodies of the 3 children in the trunk of his car.[11]
https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect
I believe there was a similar previous case from DC, from back in the 70's I think
"We are all responsible for our own personal safety, whether we like it or not." Why can't Constitutional Carry be directly linked to the SCOTUS rulings?
Hey, point people to Every Town for a gun Safety’s video repository of safety videos on how to safely handle, clean, store, and use firearms. They are a gun safety organization right? For the one who I know is serious and was just at Gun Connection we will be doing safety briefings and handling practices over FaceTime before she ever handles live ammunition.