Kolbe v O'Malley Motion For Summary Judgement Filed 17 March 2014

[Haides]

Yeah, let's show that NRA who's boss! Are they even a party to the suit?

 

[Mr H]

no, but they are providing support

but hey... why let facts get in the way of a good lynch mob, right??

 

[MDFF2008]

And the response from the Republican AG?

crickets?

 

[Jaybeez]

And the response from the Republican AG?

crickets?

go to his facebook page, half his posts are pro 2A.
Jeff Pritzker for attorney general
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=881519108544189

 

[Mr H]

For those of us not on FB, his email excuses and lack of communication by other means makes him seem completely detached.

 

[Afrikeber]

I know Jeff Pritzker the running republican AG and his wife. Great folks. Sure would love to see Frosh go away back to defending child molesters and out of public office. Frosh's image sickens me.

 

[AliasNeo07]

Are we appealing this?

 

[Mr H]

As mentioned several times, both sides had said all along that an appeal would happen.

I'm suspecting there are some procedural bits to be worked before that can happen.

 

[JohnnyE]

I just want this thread to roll to the next page. I'm tired of that ugly mug greeting me at the top of page 41 when I check this thread. Damn near couldn't finish my dinner last night.

 

[fightinbluhen51]

I just want this thread to roll to the next page. I'm tired of that ugly mug greeting me at the top of page 41 when I check this thread. Damn near couldn't finish my dinner last night.

Here's some help....

 

[Kharn]

Are we appealing this?

No lawyer worth his salt turns in documents before the deadline.

 

[srephwed]

He looks like a scientific experiment gone horribly wrong.Actually he is a scientific experiment gone horribly wrong.Tell everyone you know to get out and vote.It's the only way we get our state back!!!

 

[oldman12]

Looks like a friggin pedophile. F that piece of shit . We need to make sure he does not win.

 

[Kharn]

I think he looks like Ned Flanders, but with extra disdain for little people.

 

[Mr H]

Flanders has morals.

 

[Tomcat]

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/20/california-school-district-becomes-latest-to-allow-officers-to-carry-ar-15s/

“These rifles give us greater flexibility in dealing with a person with bad intent who comes onto any of our campuses.”

But we can't have one to protect ourselves?

 

[Haides]

Link seems broken.

But it doesn't surprise me, although it still makes me mad. Why should cops be able to defend someone else's kids with AR's when we can't even use them to defend our own? They obviously want them for a reason, and no doubt those are the same reasons we want them. Then again liberals & anti-gunners are all about double standards...

 

[Tomcat]

Re done should work now

 

[Haides]

They described the rifles as tools. Imagine that.

The rifles aren't even being carried, they're being kept in the trunk of the officers' cars, how is that "militarized?" Not to mention the fact that no military has ever issued an AR-15 to it's soldiers...

People find weird things to complain about.

 

[5.56blaster]

That's not so. In 1983 when I became an Air Force cop all of are rifles were stamped Colt's AR-15. They were all safe-semi-full but that was what was on the rifle. BUT I do understand what your point. Im just trying to pass on some firearms history and not f%&king with what your saying.