Doesn't the gun act of 1968 give the executive branch extremely broad abilities to declare guns don't have "sporting" purposes and then ban them?
What about the fact that the US is also bound to follow treaties "object and purpose" that are signed but not ratified?
All I can say is that if the blue hats want my gun, I'll let them have it. so to speak...
What about the fact that the US is also bound to follow treaties "object and purpose" that are signed but not ratified?
All I can say is that if the blue hats want my gun, I'll let them have it. so to speak...