HPRB December 1, 2015 Meeting Thread

[motorcoachdoug]

Gryphon I agree with you. I cant help but wonder if Anti AG has called him and "asked" is the nicer way of putting it , not to make any changes in the Lic section.. True he answers to Hogan, but I cant help but wonder if the AG is trying to hold something over him or threatened him with something as well.

 

[protegeV]

Dblas, why beat around the bush? Which one of us is it you feel is being too critical or unrealistic in regards to the board?

I'm sure there are a few and I'm probably one of them. I had some not so nice things to say about the two female board members, but I've only been to one meeting. I guess I don't have full perspective.

 

[BeoBill]

Yes. I could do a better job but I don't fit the demographic that they are looking for. If they want to make an exception I would be glad to do it.

I'm in too, if there's a demographic slot for an OFWG.

 

[BeoBill]

Pretty much this, but now we have a clean slate with no members doing anything in anyway any of the former members did. And you are correct, you can't learn experience.

The current members are trying to unfvck a very fvcked up process, how about we keep giving them support to do so as opposed to busting their balls and calling them idiots, and other such names. At some point doing so will bight us in the ass and they will no longer care what we are trying to do because they will look at these threads and then say fvck it, let's get the AG involved and then we are all ****ed.

Sorry Schipperke for picking your post to vent, maybe some of it will sink in to those that keep running their mouths without thinking.

I haven't seen that done on any of the HPRB Meeting threads. Perhaps you could point out some examples since the new Board was seated?

 

[BeoBill]

Shame Pallozzi didn't pan out.

His hands may be tied. Who knows, since he hasn't said very much on the subject on the record.

 

[GrimReaper]

Who is in charge of the licensing division? Knaub? Or is there anyone above him

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[montoya32]

Who is in charge of the licensing division? Knaub? Or is there anyone above him

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Stachursky is the new licensing division commander.

 

[teratos]

I can't speak on MSP's official position or statement, but remember Lasuick made a comment about Heller only applying to DC That just shows where some of their heads are at.

Actually, Heller does apply only to DC. That's why we have McDonald......

 

[protegeV]

Actually, Heller does apply only to DC. That's why we have McDonald......

I can't remember the specifics, but it's scotus. There are some precedents set on a federal basis, no?
At least that's what eveyone in the room was clamoring about when he said it

 

[teratos]

I can't remember the specifics, but it's scotus. There are some precedents set on a federal basis, no? At least that's what eveyone in the room was clamoring about when he said it

Regardless. McDonald incorporated the 2A against the States. They have no recourse.

 

[Gryphon]

You are both correct

What struck us casual observers was that Lazuick seemed to be suggesting that Heller was no more than a trial court decision, having no ramifications beyond the District of Columbia. Like Rowe v. Wade only being applicable to the state that it came out of.

Then [Casey] topped it off last week by proclaiming a permit/right to carry in Maryland was a mere privilege - not just in practice, but under the current law.

Like I said, traditions die hard.

 

[Schipperke]

I'm in too, if there's a demographic slot for an OFWG.

That should be four out of five on the board, to reflect the gun community.

 

[AntiGun]

I NEED EVERYONE WHO ATTENDED MY 1ST OR 2ND HEARING TO JUST POST AND SAY "ATTENDED". I NEED TO SEND YOU ALL A MESSAGE.

Attended. (1st hearing)

Sorry for the late response but work and family have kept me busy lately.

 

[montoya32]

Meeting Audio has been posted.

 

[Brooklyn]

With regards to Knaub's comments about a permit being a privilege, in Maryland that is true. Woolard affirmed that by way of ruling that g&s was constitutional.

Sad, but true

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Not quite.. it was a facial challenge..it remains to be seen if it survives an as applied challenge..

Knaubs claim is at Best overbroad.