The Fat Lady is still having breakfast in Annapolis, fingers crossed. Veto.
The politics of fear once again and seemingly forever at play. "You've got to vote for this guy because he's better than the turd the Democrats will nominate!" Nonsense.
The MDGOP sold us all down the river with bump stock and the ERPO bills. They played politics with our rights so they might have a better shot at staying in office. What is the point of voting for people who will abandon your principles when it matters most? At least the gun grabber will say "I want your guns" and actively scheme to come get them. The closet turds/RINOs (and I use the term RINO begrudgingly, broadly speaking in a macro sense, there is practically no difference in the parties) will lie to our faces and then stab us in the back. The guy who is upfront about it can be countered, protested, worked again. The backstabber will have the element of surprise. Why vote for that guy? If the "conservative party" isn't going to do conservative things, fvck them.
If we're constantly willing to prop up a particular candidate/official because they are "less bad" than the other guy, we will continue to get a stream of shitty candidates that don't actually move the needle. For fvck's sake, the Sun put out an editorial last week suggesting Hogan was a closet Democrat!
If you want to abandon your principles and vote for someone who chose to sign legislation that will allow confiscation of your firearms based on one person telling a lie, that's your business. Kindly don't belittle those of us who will stick to our principles and refuse to support in any form or fashion those who support Communist tactics such as those found in the ERPO bills. No.
Show me a candidate worth my vote and they'll get it. Until that time, the gun grabbing turds (regardless of party affiliation) can FOAD. Hogan and his ilk can suck it.
As I said, give us the alternative.
Sticking to your principles (principals) is fine but we need an alternative.
As has been said many times:
"Hope is not a strategy" seems to apply here as well.
Give us a plan besides doing nothing, because that's not a plan either
I have something in the works for this. If I am successful, it will be shared with MDS.
How about not supporting backstabbing "Republicans" even if it means letting a Democrat take power? Hell, the faster we fall down their hell hole, the sooner we'd be justified in opening box 4 and fixing this mess.
Explain the HPRB not being filled with Marylander's to prevent gun violence. Guy is between a rock and a hard place. Ever since campaign I've never heard him with a proactive 2A message. He was on record he wouldn't seek changing previous Maryland gun laws. Well that to me includes our carry scheme. He goes on record championing Bump stock bans and "embracing" Red Flag laws. I don't get the shock right now, he's been saying his position all along. Let a Dem win, go ahead. Get your checkbook out come tax time, regulate even more businesses out of Maryland to neighbor states, make the state an official sanctuary state, and next that magazine policy we have now will become prohibition. It's a binary choice, and if you are so pissed at the Gov, you'd rather have worse.. well heck just more common sense I guess. Governor doesn't have the luxury of pockets of Republican voters like the delegates do. It's why those delegates changed their votes, not a damn thing to do with their convictions.
As I said, give us the alternative.
Sticking to your principles (principals) is fine but we need an alternative.
As has been said many times:
"Hope is not a strategy" seems to apply here as well.
Give us a plan besides doing nothing, because that's not a plan either
Not supporting a candidate is ok, but vote for the opposition if that's what you feel will help our situation.
At least that's a plan.
But I'm not gonna sit and do nothing.
That helps only the opposition. Part of having principles also means doing something instead of sitting it out IMO.
I think this discussion has gone as far as it can go without devolving into something else.
I'm voting for Hogan, have any of you read the profiles of the wacko crazy libtards running against him? I've got to live in this crappy state and if any of the Dims get elected they will make it an even bigger @#ithole with Frosh's blessing and help.
Hogan is far from perfect but he has at least tried to keep taxes in check and has started road projects all around the state. I would love to see the legislature pick up enough Republican seats to make the Governors vetoes stick, right now every one is overridden.
What I especially view as a betrayal is the couple legislators I thought were backing our fight for our rights, only to have them vote in favor of this POS legislation.
WHY?
It would pass without their vote. They simply did not need to put in a metoo vote. Does this mean that they believed their constitutents actually supported this bill? Certainly we have not done that poor of a job communicating how unhappy we are, or do they just view us as chicken littles now, destined to turn out en masse at anything?
Why the betrayal by these folks in particular?
Yeah, better to have somebody like O'Malley in there championing something like FSA2013. He had to force some people to vote for FSA2013 to get it passed. Much better to have an O'Malley versus a Hogan. Plus, the rain tax was brilliant and didn't O'Malley increase the gas tax too. Great stuff for the environment and our pocket books.
Did O'Malley sign the bill repealing the shell casing law? I ask because I cannot remember.
Now, let me go find that sarcasm button.