Has Obama Been Soft on Terrorism So That He Can Use It to Justify More Gun Control?

[good guy 176]

Exactly. Dumbass obviously thinks that by reaching-out with a policy of appeasement and trying to 'understand' their culture, that's going to somehow magically stop terrorist attacks against Americans.

I can tell you from experience that the only thing they understand is...a thorough ass-whipping. Until we adopt that as our official policy against radical Islam, this kinda shit is going to continue to happen.

Right on! The soft targets are too many to count and there will be endless attacks in the US and around the world for years to come as we continue to poke the hornets nests. They are patient, determined bastards, and they will be harder to exterminate than a mound of fire ants.

Lew--Ranger63
Korea, Vietnam, Vietnam II, W. Germany, Fort Benning, Fort Jackson, Fort Rucker, Fort Stewart, Fort Knox, Fort Meade.

 

[fred333]

He is not stupid... He is evil...

I think he's too stupid (ignorant) to be evil.

 

[fred333]

No ... He's a dangerous ideologue.

I think his handlers're ideologues, he's just a blacktivist idiot.

 

[swinokur]

Nah. But gun control is a bonus point for him. he is soft on terrorism no matter what happens here.

 

[MAJRUSSO]

Fast & Furious failed miserably, and A.F. Branco seems to think so ...

I believe that he is such a pompous piece of crap that he cant even imagine his approach to governance and fighting terrorism isnt working. So it must be guns that are the problem. Not his shit for brains policies.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

[Major03]

I don't think his misguided international policies are driven by his anti-gun agenda. Having said that, I absolutely think that he sees each case of terrorism as an opportunity to advance his anti-gun agenda. Sadly it's working. We are, at best, one generation away.