Great editorial on rifle bans in the Wall Street Journal

[Publius]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop#articleTabs=article

 

[Hopalong]

Forum rules: post links and short snippets, not whole articles. You're violating copywright laws.

 

[PJDiesel]

Forum rules: post links and short snippets, not whole articles. You're violating copywright laws.

He linked the article?

 

[Hopalong]

He linked the article?

No, the post got changed. Original post was the article in its entirety.

B^)

 

[frogman68]

Surprised that made it to print/ online

this is the type of person we are dealing with


http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...ark-sen-feinstein-shoots-off-mouth-hits-foot/

think a DINO movement needs to start in CA

 

[TapRackBang]

No, the post got changed. Original post was the article in its entirety.
B^)

Can't read it otherwise. It's behind WSJ paywall.

 

[teratos]

Worked fine for me. Good read.

 

[MDLiberty]

paywall

 

[ShallNotInfringe]

Pay wall.

*** With all this talk about "gun control", I haven't heard one politician say how they plan to take guns away from criminals ***

 

[Publius]

Please try this link from a google search. Should work for everyone. Very good editorial. They are finally screaming "unconstitutional" about these rifle bans that affect even their own state. This is the largest circulation newspaper in America. It is indeed hard to fathom how bans of the best selling rifle of the past 20 years, made by more than 80 companies and involved in a very disproportionately low number of crimes, can avoid vigorous court challenges.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324600704578402760760473582.html

 

[Schipperke]

Yes try this http://is.gd/VKeKvt , then click the link there. Google somehow gets to many WSJ w/o the nag screen. Try choosing the cached version too

 

[TapRackBang]

Only works if you hit the cache:

https://webcache.googleusercontent....02760760473582.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

[straightsilver3]

Yes try this http://is.gd/VKeKvt , then click the link there. Google somehow gets to many WSJ w/o the nag screen. Try choosing the cached version too

This one works Thanks real good Read. The other poster read was good too.

 

[md123]

Good article until they quote that hag Ginsberg, who reminds us that libs play the long game.

She's probably right. In 35 years when the country is unrecognizable and the court has been packed by leftist "Presidents", they will just overturn Heller.



.

 

[on_the_rox]

That is a good article.

 

[ShallNotInfringe]

All roads lead to pay wall. I used your search link and ended up at pay to read. Thanks anyway.

*** With all this talk about "gun control", I haven't heard one politician say how they plan to take guns away from criminals ***

 

[snakep]

That worked, thanks...a good article from the WSJ.

 

[Ranger Tom]

Hope the "Owe" brothers read and understand it.

 

[Brooklyn]

Good article until they quote that hag Ginsberg, who reminds us that libs play the long game.

She's probably right. In 35 years when the country is unrecognizable and the court has been packed by leftist "Presidents", they will just overturn Heller.



.

Trust me, if that happens the country will not be worth saving, so it will not matter.