alucard0822
For great Justice
you are too kindExcellent assessment.
Agreed on most points. (Well, all but one......)
OP, the grip angle on the GLOCK is more like the P-08 Luger, than the 1911.
The Ruger .22 is close to the same grip angle of the Luger.
I agree with everything that alucard0822 said, except for the grip or grasp of the pistol.
That 'thumbs forward' "stuff" doesn't work with/for me. It feels too un-natural.
I'm a firm believer in using the stance/grasp/grip that works for YOU.
I grasp all pistols and revolvers, using a Weaver Stance or slightly modified Weaver Stance.
"Push/pull". Thumbs slightly curved and relaxed.
When the pistol is aimed at the target, I have much more control over the pistol and any recoil.
Here is what that G19 should be capable of.
This is the FIRST group fired from my (then) new G19 Gen3.
This group is one magazine full, using a 6 o'clock hold on the 10 ring.
15 yards. Ammo was CCI Blazer (aluminum cased) 115 gr FMJ.
I found out that MY pistol shoots to where the top of the front sight is, out to 25 yards.
The grip used was a Weaver Stance. Standing. No artificial support.
Group was shot at St. Charles Sportsman's Club indoor range.
Sorry. This is a crappy cellphone pic, from my old flip phone. (I wasn't expecting to take photos at the range.)
True, if a stance or grip doesn't work for someone, they should use something better, nothing ever improves if people simply stick to the training Du Jour, and it is important to at least learn other stances/holds as a comparison. Thing is the reason the training Du Jour is so popular is because it does work for most people, offers a standard in training, and tends to be the best at the time. For about the last 20 years that standard is modified/modern isosceles with a Letham-Enos grip(AKA thumbs forward), takes some work to adapt to it, but it's at least worth a try. Weaver was groundbreaking in it's day, but haven't seen any competitor or instructor use it in years, too limiting shooting while moving, doesn't deal with recoil as well, or off center targets.
alucard that should be a Glock sticky
It took me an hour or more reading multiple threads after getting my Glock to get all this info and tell me my other pistols made me a spoiled shooter
Same happened to me when I was a new shooter primarily shot revolvers and tried a GLOCK, a few inches to the left reguardless of what I did and didn't like the grip. Years later I picked up the first gen 3 SF model to hit my LGS, went in with cash to buy something else, walked out with the GLOCK, was disappointed the first couple mags. This is after a few years of competiton, carry, and a lot of defensive classes with other autos, even teaching a couple myself. I had to really stop and concentrate on the fundementals to see that I was the problem, despite being far from a new shooter. Soon as I figured out what I was doing wrong, I fixed it, and hit center almost immediately, then grew to love them, well at least the SF and Gen4s, still not huge on the grip angle and size of the standard gen3s. Thing is the Gen4 and SF grip angle and shape tends to be very similar to a double stack 1911 with an arched mainspring, about 110 degrees, feels less than standard gen 1-3s because of the flatter backstrap, and for most, me included points much better. Most pistols range between 105-112 degrees, the P-08 Luger is 125 degrees wayyy more than a GLOCK, The infamous GLOCK grip angle isn't the horrific anomaly it is made out to be.
G19G4, 1911A1, G20SF, 1911 wedge MSH, not only are the grip angles about identical, the general shape is fairly close, with the GLOCKs obviously having a deeper and higher grip pocket.
Last edited: