Finally sorted through it all....

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • armed ferret

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Sep 23, 2008
    7,943
    McDoogal's
    ...well, almost. Last load is in the tumbler now. :innocent0

    20140214_184239_zps6b0ccac4.jpg


    .223 on the left, 5.56 on the right. which one should I turn into .300BLK? :D


    (those are the 100-round belted .50BMG cans, btw)
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    FWIW - I had better case life using the 5.56 brass for supersonic loads, and the .223 for subsonic use. Although I guess for subsonic it wouldn't really matter.
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    Have you noticed a discernable difference in velocity loading .223 vs 5.56 converted brass?

    Not really. I'd been doing batches at first using mixed head-stamps (comm./mil.) and my readings were pretty consistent.

    I noticed I had slightly better consistency with subs using comm. .223 brass, but I couldn't say for certain the brass is why.
     

    BenL

    John Galt Speaking.
    Great, thanks. I have ~ 800 pieces of 300BLK headstamped brass, and have 5,000 pieces of 5.56LC, some of which I want to convert. Wanted to make sure I can just dump them all into one big pile.
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    Great, thanks. I have ~ 800 pieces of 300BLK headstamped brass, and have 5,000 pieces of 5.56LC, some of which I want to convert. Wanted to make sure I can just dump them all into one big pile.

    For supersonic use, I definitely had better luck/consistency with LC brass.

    I was going beyond 2400fps with 110gr Vmax's, primers were starting to show signs, but the LC brass held up a lot better then Remington and PMC brass at those charge levels.

    After 2 firings, the comm. brass had the primer pockets open up, the LC brass made it to 5 (IIRC) before they opened up.
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,973
    Socialist State of Maryland
    After testing about 500 rounds, I have found that the .223 brass works better for the 300 AAC. The usual failure I get with supersonic loads is loose primers and the 5.56 cases stretch before the .223. These are not ridiculously high loads either, it is just the margins are narrower for the 300 BO.

    John
     

    armed ferret

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Sep 23, 2008
    7,943
    McDoogal's
    Well now don't I feel silly. I guess I am used to looking at 5.56 brass that I pick up. I don't think I've ever seen it marked as 5.56

    Typically it isn't (although I do have some PPU and some Privi brass that is). That's what gives it away. .223 is marked accordingly; most 5.56 is just the manufacturer's initials and a year code the majority of the time. There are exceptions of course, but if it doesn't say .223 I assume 5.56.
     

    BigDaddy

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 7, 2014
    2,235
    Long time ago I bought once fired mil brass. There were at least 20 different headstamps or dates. Most were LC, WCC, R-P or Fed. I then started weighing them. Without primers the range was from mid 80 gr to 95 grs as best I recall. I threw away the light and heavy cases.
    I do not recall if different years from the same manufacturer were similar in weight.
     

    Pinecone

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 4, 2013
    28,175
    .223/5.56 brass has less difference in case capacity than other military rounds.

    One way to see this is to weigh the different headstamps.

    .308/7.62 is a fairly large difference in case capacities between different brass, enough to change charge weights by almost 1/2 grain.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,650
    Messages
    7,289,961
    Members
    33,496
    Latest member
    GD-3

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom