So according to occbrian's post above, MSI officially supports the action of engage?
The organization said no such thing. We are individuals. MSI fights for 2A Rights. We do not demonize inanimate objects. That is left to the liberals.
So according to occbrian's post above, MSI officially supports the action of engage?
So according to occbrian's post above, MSI officially supports the action of engage?
So according to occbrian's post above, MSI officially supports the action of engage?
So according to occbrian's post above, MSI officially supports the action of engage?
It accelerated nothing. The fact that the technology exists is all they need to proceed. To believe a retailer selling one of these monstrosities will influence our strongly anti-gun legislature to do anything faster is just delusional.
The organization said no such thing. We are individuals. MSI fights for 2A Rights. We do not demonize inanimate objects. That is left to the liberals.
(d) Report. --
(1) The Handgun Roster Board annually shall:
(i) review the status of personalized handgun technology; and(2) In reviewing the status of personalized handgun technology under paragraph (1) of this subsection, the Handgun Roster Board shall consider:
(ii) on or before July 1, report its findings to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2-1246 of the State Government Article, to the General Assembly.
(i) the number and variety of models and calibers of personalized handguns that are available for sale;
(ii) each study, analysis, or other evaluation of personalized handguns conducted or commissioned by:
1. the National Institute of Justice;(iii) any other information that the Handgun Roster Board considers relevant.
2. a federal, State, or local law enforcement laboratory; or
3. any other entity with an expertise in handgun technology; and
It accelerated nothing. The fact that the technology exists is all they need to proceed. To believe a retailer selling one of these monstrosities will influence our strongly anti-gun legislature to do anything faster is just delusional.
True, but before this we didn't have one of our own standing in front of national media saying that they are ok with this and trust it enough to sell it to their customers.
Are you confident that this is safe technology?
No trolling, he commented and concurred with teratos. The simple answer of no would have sufficed. No need to be childish.
No. I think it sucks.
I doubt Andy is going to be using this as his carry/home defense gun.
Banning Glocks fails the "common use" test put forth in Heller.
Mandating this technology is Unconstitutional and violates anti-trust laws.
Everyone is directing their anger at the wrong people. If the last line of defense for 2A in NJ is depending on a gun store to NOT sell a gun, then they've already lost. Get mad at nj voters and politicians. Not Andy.
It's a gun. It's legal. I won't buy one by I have no problem with a company offering it for sale. Iliberty.
No trolling, he commented and concurred with teratos. The simple answer of no would have sufficed. No need to be childish.
Then why in the hell would he or anyone else comfortable selling it to a customer? Says a lot about the ethics of a person to sell a product that is this questionable.
Isn't that the bitch about liberty. In supporting the principle, you have to take the good with the bad. Think about Voltaire's words: "I do not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."
Too late, you won the prize for that by blaming Andy/Engage for LAWS being passed. Only an idiot would think a local shop has that kind of power.
Beretta couldn't even sway the MD Legislators but you think Engage can by selling something?