Dogabutila
Ultimate Member
- Dec 21, 2010
- 2,362
More recoil means higher split times, which really means I can shoot the bad guy less before he falls down or runs away.
What's your definition of recoil, are we talkin 30-06 or 577 t-Rex ? Cuz you can keep the t-Rex and call me a pansy!Since being a member of MDS I've ready numerous posts that guys don't like recoil when it comes to AK's and AR's. Even the infamous Clandestine has made references to less recoil before IIRC. Why don't you want recoil with your rifle? Zippy, if you don't want recoil then shoot your .22 all day. But damnit....its a rifle, its suppose to have recoil. Please help me understand this?
(I decided to make it a poll)
Less recoil makes a weapon a more effective defensive tool.
Take 2 Bolt Action .308's. One equipped with a Recoil Pad, Recoil Reducer and a Brake, and the other bone stock. The modded .308 will allow faster follow up shots and allow the shooter to practice with less fatigue.
I dont see people buying .50BMG Barrets and removing the Brake to make the gun more "Manly".
Then you have idiots who put high recoiling fireamrs in the hands of children and small women. Nothing like making someones first time shooting a painful endeavor and making them not want to shoot again. Genius!
Amateurs prefer a gun that recoils more.
I remember a couple a months ago just after I bought an Advantage Arms .22 conversion kit for my Glock 35 and was down at the range trying it out. One of the RSO's came up to me asking if I was shooting a 22 conversion and would I let the woman standing next to him try it out. I loaded up a couple of mags, handed the mags and pistol to her and told her to have fun. After she finished and had the big smile on here face, she said there was still hope for here to be interested in shooting. That day was her first time shooting and her boyfriend 4 lanes down was try to start her off with his GLock 21 which was too much kick and painful for her to shoot. If it wasn't for the RSO who saw that I was shooting the 22 conversion, I think she would have been turned off to shooting altogether.
I'm 5'4 130. I've taught girls smaller than me, (sub 5 feet, probably under 100lb) to shoot. And we start on my glock 17. If you teach them right, it doesn't make too much difference.
Less recoil makes a weapon a more effective defensive tool.
Take 2 Bolt Action .308's. One equipped with a Recoil Pad, Recoil Reducer and a Brake, and the other bone stock. The modded .308 will allow faster follow up shots and allow the shooter to practice with less fatigue.
I dont see people buying .50BMG Barrets and removing the Brake to make the gun more "Manly".
Then you have idiots who put high recoiling fireamrs in the hands of children and small women. Nothing like making someones first time shooting a painful endeavor and making them not want to shoot again. Genius!
Amateurs prefer a gun that recoils more.
That's great if they're not recoil shy. I know people who are 6 feet tall, 200 lbs and never enjoy shooting anything big. I also have a buddy who is 120 lbs, and his favorite gun to shoot is a mosin m44.
Teaching can only go so far, if the person doesn't enjoy it, so, yeah. It does make a difference.
I have never been recoil sensitive. Never.
Then, a good friend offered his rifle that he built (on a Ruger #1), for me to shoot.
The caliber - .375 H&H Magnum. Octagonal barrel. Beautiful rifle!!
I 'saddled up' behind the stock and fired it from the bench.
"Boooooooooooooooooom!"
"Wanna shoot it, again?"
"Absolutely!"
Round #2 downrange.
"Wanna shoot it, again?"
"Sure."
Round #3 downrange.
"Wanna shoot it, again?"
"Take this rifle and put it where the sun don't shine!"
That darned .375 H&H just about crossed my eyes. I know they were watering!
I had to give up shooting my M1 Garand in High Power Rifle, because of a back injury, and recoil. (And not being able to get out of Prone.)
Manly has nothing to do with it. If I could make a .308 that produced no felt recoil at all but kept the same ballistics as a standard one, I'd have produced a better weapon.