Do we really need our PMs sensored?

[outrider58]

I mean, a conversation between two people in private don't need protection from "dirty" words.

 

[texkev]

it carries over by default

 

[JohnnyE]

PM's should be a free for all.

 

[Inigoes]

PM's should be a free for all.

Until some [insert a not nice word here] publishes them to the rest of the community.

There has been an occasion or two someone got sand in their crack.

 

[Boondock Saint]

Personally I would only sensor something if I was interested in data on it. Like a connection open or closed, temperature readouts over time, lows and highs within a system, etc., etc.

That said:

 

[teratos]

I mean, a conversation between two people in private don't need protection from "dirty" words.

What happens in the PMs stays in the PMs.

 

[JohnnyE]

PM's are between two consenting adults who in no way offend the delicate sensibilities of the rest of the (leather-skinned) MDS community.

 

[eruby]

It's across the board software

PLEASE kill me someone

 

[Sage954]

Second protects the first

 

[Worsley]

oof.

 

[teratos]

Now Outrider thinks I want to lung punch his chart box.

 

[eruby]

I won't be crass .....

 

[brianns]

a PM is a PM right?

Maybe we'll get a 'like' button when the PM rules are adjusted.

 

[CaptainAwesome]

I mean, a conversation between two people in private don't need protection from "dirty" words.

No more nekkid selfies anymore

 

[outrider58]

a PM is a PM right?

Maybe we'll get a 'like' button when the PM rules are adjusted.

Like

 

[outrider58]

No more nekkid selfies anymore

Thought you would enjoy them.

 

[Boondock Saint]

Can we sensor the censoring? We certainly don't want to censor the sensors. That would probably draw a censure.

 

[welder516]

F**% That S**^

 

[welder516]

How about dirty web-cam chat room

 

[TI-tick]

Can we sensor the censoring? We certainly don't want to censor the sensors. That would probably draw a censure.

There should be a pole on this.