Greetings,
I was wondering if anyone has ever had the opportunity and or success in contesting the registration of a "Lower" in our State?
From reading the laws and definitions that are given; what the MSP consider a "80 percent lower" is in all factual reality a item that meets their criteria is only 25% of that "lower" so it is in fact useless.
So if a 80 percent lower does not meet their own definitions , why do the FFL's not just hand the "Receiver" over to the purchaser without any registration?
Even if the Lower was completed in accordance to the State laws for registration , the built or assembled firearm still does not meet all the requirements? So is it just a "play on the language to confuse people?"
I was wondering if anyone has ever had the opportunity and or success in contesting the registration of a "Lower" in our State?
From reading the laws and definitions that are given; what the MSP consider a "80 percent lower" is in all factual reality a item that meets their criteria is only 25% of that "lower" so it is in fact useless.
So if a 80 percent lower does not meet their own definitions , why do the FFL's not just hand the "Receiver" over to the purchaser without any registration?
Even if the Lower was completed in accordance to the State laws for registration , the built or assembled firearm still does not meet all the requirements? So is it just a "play on the language to confuse people?"