Conley v. United States, criminal case win vs Washington DC

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Kharn

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 9, 2008
    3,587
    Hazzard County
    Cliffnotes: DC made it a felony to be in a motor vehicle that contained an illegal gun, court says try again.

    The fundamental constitutional vice of § 22 - 2511 is that it criminalizes entirely innocent behavior — merely remaining in the vicinity of a firearm in a vehicle, which the average citizen would not suppose to be wrongful (let alone felonious) — without requiring the government to prove that the defendant had notice of any legal duty to behave otherwise.This is a defect that we cannot cure by interpreting the statutory language. Accordingly, we are obliged to hold that §22 -2511 is unconstitutional on its face and that appellant‟s conviction for violating that statute must be reversed

    Ruling available here
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,929
    WV
    Note that this is DC's version of a state supreme court, and not the US circuit for the District of Columbia.
    They did reference the DC code for carrying a pistol w/o a license. I thought that statute was repealed, or do they just leave it there and not issue any licenses?
     

    Kharn

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 9, 2008
    3,587
    Hazzard County
    Note that this is DC's version of a state supreme court, and not the US circuit for the District of Columbia.
    They did reference the DC code for carrying a pistol w/o a license. I thought that statute was repealed, or do they just leave it there and not issue any licenses?
    Still under litigation in Palmer, going on ~4 years. :mad54:
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,929
    WV
    Still under litigation in Palmer, going on ~4 years. :mad54:

    Maybe they should have filed in DC's court system; they probably would have been all the way through by now.

    It's also too bad this isn't a 2A case, hence probably the reason this plaintiff won.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,075
    Messages
    7,307,126
    Members
    33,566
    Latest member
    Pureblood

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom