shottypimpin
Member
- Jun 14, 2011
- 1
Well, as I said, the all metal gun was the deciding factor. I didn't know until I saw it that it was made by Walther, that was more or less icing on the cake. I'm thinking that the price differential is not going to be so significant when the Smith hits the market. I'm betting it's gonna retail in the mid 5's which makes it even less attractive over the Colt. If I can have a Walther built all metal gun versus a polymer gun then my money is going for the metal. I think you may have time to save up the extra bucks for the Colt while your waiting to see what the Smith feels like.
I don't understand how being more metal plays any significant roll in your decision. So you will pay upwards of $300 more because the the colt has more metal parts? First and foremost the s&w is made in the USA and not in Germany like the colt. Second this is a 22 caliber gun not a battle rifle that your going to war with so who cares that the colt is more metal. Which brings my final point up. More metal more trouble to upkeep. The s&w is a lot better looking in my opinion and it is lighter so carrying it around all day isnt troublesome. I never shot the colt but the mp15 is magic. It's fun and accurate plus you can customize almost anything on it.